Bouldin v. Sheerer
Cited by
- Butler v. Va Sant 365 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1961
- Hansen v. Hansen 224 P. 826 Ariz. 1924
- City of Phoenix v. Jones 189 P. 242 Ariz. 1920
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Daggs v. Hoskins 52 P. 350
- Trimble v. Long 56 P. 731
- Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co. 24 P. 257
- Gardiner v. Gardiner 60 P. 875
- Daggs v. Field 52 P. 773
- Maricopa County v. Jordan 60 P. 693
- Putnam v. Putnam 24 P. 320
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4 , 60 Pac. 693 ; Gardner v. Gardner, 7 Ariz. 73 , 60 Pac. 875 ; Trimble et al. v. Long, 6 Ariz. 268 , 56 Pac. 731 ; Daggs et al. v. Field, 6 Ariz. 47 , 52 Pac. 773 ; Daggs et al. v. Hoskins et al., 5 Ariz. 236 , 52 Pac. 350 ; Putnam v. Putnam, 3 Ariz. 182 , 24 Pac. 320 .; Wolfley v. Gila River Irr. Co., 3 Ariz. 176 , 24 Pac. 257 . *248 The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced. ' The appeal in this case is dismissed.