Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson, 195 P. 538.
-
Hines v. Gale
213 P. 395
Ariz. 1923
It is only where the evidence is insufficient • to support a verdict, or where it is so weak that upon a motion for a new trial after verdict the court would feel constrained to set it aside, that the court is justified in directing a verdict.” , 195 Pac.
- Town of Flagstaff v. Gomez 202 P. 401 Ariz. 1921
-
Town of Flagstaff v. Gomez
202 P. 401
Ariz. 1921
88 ), the facts justified submitting to the jury the question whether the negligent omission to protect the excavation was the proximate cause of the child’s death, for “proximate cause is a question of fact for the jury and may be inferred from circumstantial evidence if it is substantial.” , 195 Pac.
- Verde Tunnel & Smelter Railway Co. v. Stevenson 196 P. 164 Ariz. 1921