Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Territory of Arizona ex rel. Sherman v. Board of Supervisors, 12 P. 730.

27 citing documents.

We the People Ex Rel. v. Governor Doug Ducey Ariz. 2021
We the People Ex Rel. v. Governor Doug Ducey Ariz. 2021
Elections will not be held invalid for mere irregularities “unless it [can] be shown that the result has been affected by such irregularity.” Territory v. Board of Sup’rs
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson Ariz. 2020
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson Ariz. 2020
Territory v. Board of Sup’rs of Mohave County
Moreno v. Jones 139 P.3d 612 Ariz. 2006
Moreno v. Jones 139 P.3d 612 Ariz. 2006
of Supervisors, 12 P. 730, 732 (1887)).
Wenc v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 108 P.3d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Wenc v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 108 P.3d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
of Supervisors, , 12 P. 730, 732 (1887), and, so, "the determination of the intent of the voter is the question of primary importance."
Clifton v. Decillis 927 P.2d 772 Ariz. 1996
Followed Clifton v. Decillis 927 P.2d 772 Ariz. 1996
CONCLUSION Where the statute allows a measure of inconsistency by only requiring substantial compliance, 12 P. 730, 732 (1887), that “[i]t is the object of elections to ascertain a free expression of the will of the voters, and no mere irregularity can be considered, unless it be shown that the result has been affected by such irregularity.” Given our inability to determine legislative intent on the issue of who sh
Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. Greene 886 P.2d 1338 Ariz. 1994
FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. Greene 886 P.2d 1338 Ariz. 1994
FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. Greene 886 P.2d 1338 Ariz. 1994
Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33 857 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Miller v. Picacho Elementary School District 33 857 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
12 P. 730, 732 (1887) (“It is the object of elections to ascertain a free expression of the will of the voters ...”).
Moore v. City of Page 713 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Moore v. City of Page 713 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
12 P. 730 (1887); that the election was held in a building other than that designated in the election notice, , 127 P. 748 (1912); that ineligible electors were allowed to vote and that the ballot was not in the form required, , 235 P. 150 (1925).
Smoker v. Bolin 333 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1958
Smoker v. Bolin 333 P.2d 977 Ariz. 1958
Adams v. Bolin 271 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1954
Adams v. Bolin 271 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1954
Sherman] v. Board of Supervisors, , 12 P. 730 .
State v. Phelps 193 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1948
State v. Phelps 193 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1948
1939; , 12 P. 730 ; , ; , 169 P. 458 ; , .
Graham v. Moore 105 P.2d 962 Ariz. 1940
Graham v. Moore 105 P.2d 962 Ariz. 1940
Howard v. Luke 164 P. 439 Ariz. 1917
Howard v. Luke 164 P. 439 Ariz. 1917
’ ’ To the same effect is section 2202, volume 5, McQuillin on Municipal Corporations; Pac.