Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co., 202 P. 1077.
- In Re: Todd McLauchlan 502 P.3d 975 Ariz. 2022
-
In Re: Todd McLauchlan
502 P.3d 975
Ariz. 2022
Co., –47 (1922); –53 (App. 1983).
- Foreclosure v. Farmington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Foreclosure v. Farmington
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
3 FORECLOSURE v. FARMINGTON, et al. Decision of the Court “intended to preserve an amount of money equal to the value of the homestead exemption.” (); see also In re Elia, 198 B.R.
- Pac. W. Bank v. Castleton 434 P.3d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Pac. W. Bank v. Castleton
434 P.3d 1187
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See also Union Oil Co. of Ariz. v. Norton Morgan Commercial Co ., , 245, 202 P. 1077 (1922) (holding that "no lien shall be permitted to attach to the real property claimed as a homestead").
- DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct. 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
-
DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct.
760 P.2d 537
Ariz. 1988
202 P. 1077, 1079 (1922).
-
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court
760 P.2d 537
Ariz. 1988
When Arizona ultimately attained statehood on February 14, 1912, the constitutional conditions and limits on the management and disposal of the state school trust lands became part of Arizona’s “fundamental law.” , 202 P. 1077, 1079 (1922).
- Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Evans v. Young 661 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Evans v. Young
661 P.2d 1148
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Our supreme court discussed the question of whether a , 202 P. 1077 (1922).
- Smith v. Rabb 386 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1963
- Smith v. Rabb 386 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1963
- Kennedy v. Morrow 268 P.2d 326 Ariz. 1954
-
Kennedy v. Morrow
268 P.2d 326
Ariz. 1954
We note also that the following occurred in Union Oil Co., v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co., , 202 P. 1077, 1078 ; there one Starkweather secured a certificate-of purchase of state lands; fhe Norton Morgan Commercial Company docketed a. judgment against Starkweather, who had declared a homestead on the tract.
- McFarland v. Pruitt 210 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1949
-
McFarland v. Pruitt
210 P.2d 963
Ariz. 1949
202 P. 1077 , 1079: “* * * We think the dominant idea under our law is to save exempt to- the family the amount of money therein designated as the value of a homestead.
- Schreiber v. Hill 95 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1939
- Schreiber v. Hill 95 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1939
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. McClure 241 P. 515 Ariz. 1925
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. McClure 241 P. 515 Ariz. 1925
- Hooker v. Head 236 P. 714 Ariz. 1925
- Hooker v. Head 236 P. 714 Ariz. 1925
- First National Bank of Mesa v. Reeves 234 P. 556 Ariz. 1925
- First National Bank of Mesa v. Reeves 234 P. 556 Ariz. 1925