Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Leeker v. Leeker, 202 P. 397.
- Nesmith v. Nesmith 540 P.2d 1229 Ariz. 1975
-
Nesmith v. Nesmith
540 P.2d 1229
Ariz. 1975
That we, from a reading of the cold record, might have come to a different conclusion, we do not feel, would justify us in substituting our judgment for that of the person the law has designated to try and determine the facts.” , 202 P. 397, 401 (1921).
- Roberts v. Malott 292 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1956
- Roberts v. Malott 292 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1956
- Newton v. Superior Court 159 P.2d 307 Ariz. 1945
- Newton v. Superior Court 159 P.2d 307 Ariz. 1945
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sorrells 69 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1937
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sorrells 69 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1937
- Vazquez v. Dreyfus 269 P. 80 Ariz. 1928
- Vazquez v. Dreyfus 269 P. 80 Ariz. 1928
- Hewins v. Weiler 264 P. 101 Ariz. 1928
- Hewins v. Weiler 264 P. 101 Ariz. 1928
- Hall v. Hall 259 P. 402 Ariz. 1927
- Hall v. Hall 259 P. 402 Ariz. 1927
- Mineral Basin Copper Co. v. Standish 250 P. 364 Ariz. 1926
- Mineral Basin Copper Co. v. Standish 250 P. 364 Ariz. 1926
- Condos v. Superior Court 239 P. 1032 Ariz. 1925
- Condos v. Superior Court 239 P. 1032 Ariz. 1925
- Paul v. Paul 238 P. 399 Ariz. 1925
-
Paul v. Paul
238 P. 399
Ariz. 1925
citing page 177, 202 Pac.
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Kendall 233 P. 583 Ariz. 1925
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Kendall 233 P. 583 Ariz. 1925
- Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. 231 P. 1091 Ariz. 1925
-
Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.
231 P. 1091
Ariz. 1925
The Supreme Court, or any judge thereof may, for good cause shown, enlarge the time within which any of the things provided in this chapter may be done, but the time for taking an appeal shall in no case be extended.” , 202 Pac.
- Ollason v. Glasscock 224 P. 284 Ariz. 1924
- Ollason v. Glasscock 224 P. 284 Ariz. 1924
- Smith v. City of Nogales 211 P. 592 Ariz. 1923
-
Smith v. City of Nogales
211 P. 592
Ariz. 1923
Appellants likewise make a point that the court was without power to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial after the expiration of six months from the rendition of judgment, , 202 Pac.
- Babbitt v. Hualde 206 P. 161 Ariz. 1922
- Rico Consolidated Mining Co. v. Rico Exploration Co. 204 P. 138 Ariz. 1922