Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Industrial Commission v. Crisman, 199 P. 390.

32 citing documents.

Torres v. Jai Dining Services Ariz. 2023
Torres v. Jai Dining Services Ariz. 2023
Comm’n v. Crisman, (McAlister, J., concurring)).
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 117 P.3d 786 Ariz. 2005
Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins Ariz. 2005
Komalestewa v. ica/stoneville pedigree/wausau Ins Ariz. 2005
199 P. 390, 392 (1921); see also Ujack, 15 Ariz. at 388, 139 P. at 468.
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 117 P.3d 786 Ariz. 2005
199 P. 390, 392 (1921); see also Ujack, 15 Ariz. at 388 , 139 P. at 468 .
Ramirez v. Health Partners 972 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Ramirez v. Health Partners 972 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Comm’n v. Crisman, , 199 P. 390, 395 (1921) (McAlister, J., concurring).
Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co. 861 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1993
Hacker v. Industrial Commission 758 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Hacker v. Industrial Commission 758 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
139 P. 465 (1914); see also, , 199 P. 390 (1921) (striking 1921 legislation requiring pre-injury election).
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Id., , *162 199 P. 390, 395 (1921) (McCalester, J., concurring).
Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
Allen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 733 P.2d 290 Ariz. 1987
The legislature enacted the Workmen’s Compensation Law of 1921, but it was declared unconstitutional by this court *408 , 199 P. 390 (1921), because the act required the employee to elect his remedy before injury.
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
Barrio, 143 Ariz. at 106 , 692 P.2d at 285 ( , 199 P. 390, 395 (1921) (McAlister, J., concurring)).
Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1985
Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1985
199 P. 390 (1921), when we again struck down a re-enacted statutory prior injury requirement, explaining that compensation is not a “substitutionary remedy, [for the common law right of action] but an additional remedy.” Id.
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. 692 P.2d 280 Ariz. 1984
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. 692 P.2d 280 Ariz. 1984
199 P. 390 (1921); , 139 P. 465 (1914).
Jackson v. Northland Construction Co. 531 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1975
Jackson v. Northland Construction Co. 531 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1975
The 1925 amendment of Article 18 section 8 , 199 Pac.
Kilpatrick v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1970
Kilpatrick v. Superior Court 466 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1970
questions of fact for the jury to decide, and provided for the enactment of an Employers’ Liability Law, as well as one for Workmen’s Compulsory Compensation, ‘a different and more advanced, as well as humane public policy’ was inaugurated, one which made it possible to enforce in court a claim for personal injury or death without the necessity of overcoming practically insurmountable defenses.” , 199 P. 390 (1921).
Williams v. Magma Copper Company 425 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Williams v. Magma Copper Company 425 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
199 P. 390 (1921), the 1921 Act was struck down as being a violation of Article 18, Section 8, Arizona Constitution, because of the provision providing for an election by failure to reject prior to injury as to those in hazardous occupations.
Ream v. Wendt 410 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Ream v. Wendt 410 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
199 P. 390 (1921), our Supreme Court held the then existing Workmen’s Compensation Act unconstitutional because of a similar provision to that challenged now in the present Act.
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 405 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Adkins v. Industrial Commission 389 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1964
Adkins v. Industrial Commission 389 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1964