Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Malich v. Malich, 204 P. 1020.

30 citing documents.

Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Johnson v. Johnson 638 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1981
Johnson v. Johnson 638 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1981
There are no Arizona cases precisely on point, , 204 P. 1020, 1022 (1922) stated in dicta that “property purchased on credit belongs to the community where it has not been acquired upon a pledge or mortgage of separate property,” citing Heney v. Pesoli, 109 Cal.
Gaethje v. Gaethje 441 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Gaethje v. Gaethje 441 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
298 P. 929 (1931); , 204 P. 1020 (1922); , 137 P. 426 (1914).
Honig v. Honig 269 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1954
Honig v. Honig 269 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1954
* * * ” , 204 P. 1020, 1023 .
Porter v. Porter 195 P.2d 132 Ariz. 1948
Porter v. Porter 195 P.2d 132 Ariz. 1948
204 P. 1020 ; , 278 P. 370 .
Patterson v. Patterson 163 P.2d 850 Ariz. 1945
Patterson v. Patterson 163 P.2d 850 Ariz. 1945
Blaine v. Blaine 159 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1945
Blaine v. Blaine 159 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1945
Tyson v. Tyson 149 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1944
Tyson v. Tyson 149 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1944
Estate of Torrey v. Torrey 95 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1939
Estate of Torrey v. Torrey 95 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1939
Schwartz v. Schwartz 79 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1938
Schwartz v. Schwartz 79 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1938
court to favor the party succeeding in the divorce suit, but leaves the whole matter open to inquiry and investigation, and gives the court a freedom controlled only by the court’s sense of ‘justice and right,’ after familiarizing himself with the parties’ respective contributions in labor and capital, and their immediate and prospective needs and burdens and deserts.” , 204 Pac.
Blackman v. Blackman 43 P.2d 1011 Ariz. 1935
Blackman v. Blackman 43 P.2d 1011 Ariz. 1935
La Tourette v. La Tourette, supra; Horton v. Horton, supra; , 204 Pac.
Brown v. Brown 300 P. 1007 Ariz. 1931
Brown v. Brown 300 P. 1007 Ariz. 1931
1915B 70], supra; , 204 Pac.
Rundle v. Winters 298 P. 929 Ariz. 1931
Rundle v. Winters 298 P. 929 Ariz. 1931
La Tourette v. La Tourette, supra; , 204 Pac.
Ammerman v. Crozier 291 P. 995 Ariz. 1930
Ammerman v. Crozier 291 P. 995 Ariz. 1930
Section 2182 of the Revised Code of 1928 provides : “On entering a decree of divorce the court shall order such division of the property of the parties as to the court shall seem just and right, according to the rights of each party and their children, without compelling either party to divest himself or herself of the title to separate property.” , 204 Pac.
Horton v. Horton 278 P. 370 Ariz. 1929
Horton v. Horton 278 P. 370 Ariz. 1929