Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Coggins v. Ely, 202 P. 391.
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
-
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of Phoenix
Ariz. 2020
Before declaring a statute invalid as incomplete or unintelligible, however, we must “us[e] every authorized means to ascertain and give the [statute] an intelligible meaning.” see also City of Tucson, 242 Ariz. at 610–11 ¶¶ 97–102 (Gould, J., concurring) (discussing the “unintelligibility doctrine”).
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Tank 703 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Tank
703 P.2d 580
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
202 P. 391, 394 (1921); Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission, No. 1 CA-IC 3120, slip op.
- Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission 710 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission 710 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Castregon v. Huerta 580 P.2d 1197 Ariz. 1978
-
Castregon v. Huerta
580 P.2d 1197
Ariz. 1978
Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa County, , , 202 P. 391 (1921).
- Long v. Garrett 527 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Long v. Garrett 527 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- State v. Zumwalt 439 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- State v. Zumwalt 439 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren 398 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren 398 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
- McKinley v. Reilly 393 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1964
-
McKinley v. Reilly
393 P.2d 268
Ariz. 1964
195 * , 202 P. 391 ; , 108 P. 482 .
- State v. McCorvey 114 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1962
- Peterson v. Flood 326 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1958
-
Peterson v. Flood
326 P.2d 845
Ariz. 1958
Reading the various sections of the statutes enumerated above, and under the clear duty of the courts to give meaningful operation to all its provisions, , ; , ; , 202 P. 391 ; we hold the legislature has granted to justice courts the power to suspend/the imposition of sentence and place defendants on probation.
- Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa County 305 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1956
- Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa County 305 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1956
- State v. Suess 52 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1952
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Gem State Mut. Life Ass'n 236 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1951
-
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Gem State Mut. Life Ass'n
236 P.2d 730
Ariz. 1951
202 P. 391 ; 59 C.J. Statutes, sec.
- Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co. 224 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1950
-
Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.
224 P.2d 651
Ariz. 1950
202 P. 391 (citing cases).
- Maricopa County v. Douglas 208 P.2d 646 Ariz. 1949
-
Maricopa County v. Douglas
208 P.2d 646
Ariz. 1949
684 ; , 202 P. 391 ; , .
- Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. Randall 196 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1948
- Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. Randall 196 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1948
- Peterson v. Sundt 195 P.2d 158 Ariz. 1948
- Peterson v. Sundt 195 P.2d 158 Ariz. 1948
- Earhart v. Frohmiller 178 P.2d 436 Ariz. 1947
-
Earhart v. Frohmiller
178 P.2d 436
Ariz. 1947
433 , ]; , 202 P. 391 ; , ; Charleston Fed.
- Duhame v. State Tax Commission 179 P.2d 252 Ariz. 1947
-
Duhame v. State Tax Commission
179 P.2d 252
Ariz. 1947
202 P. 391 ; , ; Charleston Fed.
- State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. 21 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1946
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Gila County 109 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1941
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Gila County 109 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1941
- Perkins v. Hughes 91 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1939
- Perkins v. Hughes 91 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1939
- Loveland v. State of Arizona 86 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1939
- Loveland v. State of Arizona 86 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1939
- State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co. 281 N.W. 753 Minn. 1938
- Garrison v. Luke 78 P.2d 1120 Ariz. 1938
- Garrison v. Luke 78 P.2d 1120 Ariz. 1938
- Mahoney v. County of Maricopa 68 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1937
-
Mahoney v. County of Maricopa
68 P.2d 694
Ariz. 1937
App. 458 , 48 N. E. 259 .” , 202 Pac.
- Weigel v. Hohn 39 P.2d 933 Ariz. 1935
-
Weigel v. Hohn
39 P.2d 933
Ariz. 1935
371 , L. R. A. 1916E 1257; , 202 Pac.