Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Moulton v. Smith, 203 P. 562.

31 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
universally accepted as the rendition of judgment.”); , 203 P. 562, 563 (1922) (“[T]he term ‘rendering judgment’ ...
Allen v. Allen 628 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Allen v. Allen 628 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Fridena v. Maricopa County 504 P.2d 58 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Fridena v. Maricopa County 504 P.2d 58 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Black v. Industrial Commission 317 P.2d 553 Ariz. 1957
Daniel v. Telford 75 P.2d 373 Ariz. 1938
Daniel v. Telford 75 P.2d 373 Ariz. 1938
The most that has been done was on November 23, 1936, the court made an order which, , 203 Pac.
Collins v. Superior Court 62 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1936
Collins v. Superior Court 62 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1936
Griffith v. State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n 51 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1935
Griffith v. State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n 51 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1935
Kinnison v. Superior Court 46 P.2d 1087 Ariz. 1935
Kinnison v. Superior Court 46 P.2d 1087 Ariz. 1935
Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. State 39 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1934
Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. State 39 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1934
Funk v. Fillman 36 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1934
Funk v. Fillman 36 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1934
Douglas Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Lamb 25 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1933
Douglas Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Lamb 25 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1933
Section 3659, Rev. Code 1928; , 203 Pac.
Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Horwath 19 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1933
Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation District 6 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1932
Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Roosevelt Irrigation District 6 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1932
Brewer v. Morgan 263 P. 630 Ariz. 1928
Brewer v. Morgan 263 P. 630 Ariz. 1928
It is said in 34 C. J. 54, § 182: “A judgment is not final, in the sense that it cannot be withdrawn or changed by the court, until it has been entered.” , 203 Pac.
Paul v. Paul 238 P. 399 Ariz. 1925
Paul v. Paul 238 P. 399 Ariz. 1925
Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. 231 P. 1091 Ariz. 1925
Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. 231 P. 1091 Ariz. 1925
Rico Consolidated Mining Co. v. Rico Exploration Co. 204 P. 138 Ariz. 1922