Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ollason v. Glasscock, 224 P. 284.

32 citing documents.

Deebes v. Deebes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Deebes v. Deebes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(When a court allows inadmissible evidence, we will “assume, unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary, that the [court] only considered the competent evidence in arriving at the final judgment.”).
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
v. Citibank (Ariz.), ().
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
See, , Linder v. Lewis, Roca, Scoville & Beauchamp, , , , , , 224 P. 284 (1924); , Wallin v. Scottsdale Plumbing Co., 27 Ariz.App.
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
which holds that memorandum opinions are “no part of the record on appeal and therefore cannot form the basis for error”; , 224 P. 284, 286 (1924), where the Supreme Court summarily dismissed assignments of error “predicated upon the expressions of the trial court in its written opinion,” saying that “such opinion does not properly constitute any part of the record on appeal, and is in no sense an order from which an appeal will lie
Backman v. Backman 621 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Backman v. Backman 621 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
224 P. 284 (1924), cited by appellants in support of this argument, requires nothing more.
Sackin v. Kersting 466 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1970
Sackin v. Kersting 466 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1970
It is true, as Sackin urges, that a fraudulent conveyance must be pleaded and proved, , , and that the creditor has the burden of proof by clear and satisfactory evidence that the conveyance was fraudulent, , 224 P. 284 .
Cashion Gin Company v. Kulikov 399 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Cashion Gin Company v. Kulikov 399 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
References are found in the following cases: , 224 P. 284 (1924); , and Linder.
Schwartz v. Schwerin 336 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1959
Schwartz v. Schwerin 336 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1959
Dons Club v. Anderson 317 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1957
Dons Club v. Anderson 317 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1957
We said, , 224 P. 284, 286 , that “ * * * Such affirmative allegations as effectually and effectively deny all the material allegations of the complaint as if they had been specifically denied in express language * * Burnside v. Douglas School Dist.
Robinson v. Herring 253 P.2d 347 Ariz. 1953
Robinson v. Herring 253 P.2d 347 Ariz. 1953
Huish v. Lopez 218 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1950
Huish v. Lopez 218 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1950
Haynie v. Taylor 213 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1950
Followed Haynie v. Taylor 213 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1950
Defendants contend that this document is only a , 224 P. 284 , such document cannot be considered by this court on appeal.
Chernov v. Sandell 206 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1949
Chernov v. Sandell 206 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1949
Leggett v. Wardenburg 85 P.2d 989 Ariz. 1939
Leggett v. Wardenburg 85 P.2d 989 Ariz. 1939
Babbitt & Cowden Livestock Co. v. Hooker 236 P. 722 Ariz. 1925
Babbitt & Cowden Livestock Co. v. Hooker 236 P. 722 Ariz. 1925

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by