Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. La Prade v. Cox, 30 P.2d 825.
- Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
- Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
- Az Free Enterprise Club v. Katie Hobbs Ariz. 2022
-
Az Free Enterprise Club v. Katie Hobbs
Ariz. 2022
); see also Lowing, 176 Ariz. at 108 (“[A]lthough we have a healthy respect for stare decisis, we will not be bound by a rule with nothing more than precedent to recommend it.”).
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewit 399 P.3d 663 Ariz. 2017
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. Mathis 290 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Mathis
290 P.3d 1226
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-78 , -27 (1934) (“[C]onstitutions are for the purpose of laying down broad general principles, and not the expression of minute details of law.”); , (explaining that written instruments “are to be construed in the light of their purpose, an
- Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
-
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS
254 P.3d 367
Ariz. 2011
-78, -27 (1934) (“[B]ecause constitutions are for the purpose of laying down broad general principles, and not the expression of minute details of law, their terms are to be construed liberally, for
- Brewer v. Burns 213 P.3d 671 Ariz. 2009
- Brewer v. Burns 213 P.3d 671 Ariz. 2009
- Francis v. Arizona Department of Transportation 963 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Francis v. Arizona Department of Transportation 963 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Pena 683 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Pena 683 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Fridley 616 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Fridley
616 P.2d 94
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
reversed on other grounds
- State Tax Commission v. Marcus J. Lawrence Memorial Hospital 485 P.2d 277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- State Tax Commission v. Marcus J. Lawrence Memorial Hospital 485 P.2d 277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp. 420 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1966
- Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp. 420 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1966
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 405 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
- White v. Bateman 358 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1961
- White v. Bateman 358 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1961
- Bland v. Jordan 291 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1955
- Bland v. Jordan 291 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1955
- Bristor v. Cheatham 240 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1952
-
Bristor v. Cheatham
240 P.2d 185
Ariz. 1952
4 A.L.R.2d 735 ; , ; Calhoun Gold Min.
- Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. Frohmiller 208 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1949
-
Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. Frohmiller
208 P.2d 833
Ariz. 1949
220 P. 417 ; , 154 P. 202 .
- State v. Allred 195 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1948
- State v. Allred 195 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1948
- Garvey v. Trew 170 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1946
-
Garvey v. Trew
170 P.2d 845
Ariz. 1946
LaPrade, , ; Brickhouse v. Hill, 167 Ark.
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La Prade 40 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1935
-
Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La Prade
40 P.2d 94
Ariz. 1935
have held the same, in substance, , 30 Pac.