Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Goldman v. Sotelo, 60 P. 696.
- Estate of Mustonen v. Schroeder 635 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
Estate of Mustonen v. Schroeder
635 P.2d 876
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
60 P. 696 (1900); , 138 P. 544 (1914).
- Cachenos v. Baumann 544 P.2d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Cachenos v. Baumann
544 P.2d 1103
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
See, for example, P. 696 (1900) ; , 138 P. 544 (1914) ; , 201 P. 634 (1921) ; , 249 P. 76 (1926) ; , ; Wolff v. First Nat.
- Kerwin v. Bank of Douglas 379 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1963
-
Kerwin v. Bank of Douglas
379 P.2d 978
Ariz. 1963
See, e. g., , ; , ; , 60 P. 696 .
- Goff v. Guyton 346 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1959
- Remele v. Hamilton 275 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1954
- Remele v. Hamilton 275 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1954
- Stewart v. Schnepf 158 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1945
- Stewart v. Schnepf 158 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1945
- Monaghan v. Monaghan 138 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1943
- Monaghan v. Monaghan 138 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1943
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. King 121 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1942
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. King 121 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1942
- Wolff v. First National Bank 53 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1936
- Wolff v. First National Bank 53 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1936
- Steinfeld v. Marteny 10 P.2d 367 Ariz. 1932
-
Steinfeld v. Marteny
10 P.2d 367
Ariz. 1932
This objection was sustained and, since it was a matter within the court’s discretion ( , 60 Pac.
- Johnson v. Moilanen 201 P. 634 Ariz. 1921
- Costello v. Gleeson 138 P. 544 Ariz. 1914
-
Costello v. Gleeson
138 P. 544
Ariz. 1914
The court agreed with appellee, and, in the exercise of its discretion, overruled the objection to Gleeson’s competency, which, , 60 Pac.
- Hull v. Larson 131 P. 668 Ariz. 1913
- Hull v. Larson 131 P. 668 Ariz. 1913
- Mayhew v. Brislin 108 P. 253 Ariz. 1910
- Mayhew v. Brislin 108 P. 253 Ariz. 1910