Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Southern Pacific Co. v. Wilson, 85 P. 401.

40 citing documents.

Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
*605 Katz’s , 195 P. 538 (1921), , 89 P. 588 (1907), , 85 P. 401 (1906), is misplaced.
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty. 698 P.2d 712 Ariz. 1985
Lundquist v. Seales 657 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Lundquist v. Seales 657 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
85 P. 401 (1906) as requiring the trial court to reread all instructions in response to a jury question, as appellant suggests.
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hurt v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 601 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1979
Hurt v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 601 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1979
Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Solomon v. Harman 489 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1971
Solomon v. Harman 489 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1971
The damages recoverable are such as result to the beneficiaries from the death.” , 85 P. 401, 402 (1906).
Lueck v. Superior Court, County of Cochise 469 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1970
In Re the Estate of Milliman 415 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1966
In Re the Estate of Milliman 415 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1966
Boies v. Cole 407 P.2d 917 Ariz. 1965
Boies v. Cole 407 P.2d 917 Ariz. 1965
In Re Milliman's Estate 406 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Milliman's Estate 406 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
85 P. 401 (1906), the close relationship of the 1887 statute to the original Lord Campbell's Act was noted.
Womack v. Preach 165 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1946
Womack v. Preach 165 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1946
85 P. 401; , ; Estate of Lister, , 195 P. 1113 .
Cochran v. Meacham 159 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1945
Cochran v. Meacham 159 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1945
Ct. 179, 58 L. Ed. 377 ; , 85 Pac.
Keefe v. Jacobo 54 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1936
Keefe v. Jacobo 54 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1936
Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co. 45 P.2d 656 Ariz. 1935
Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co. 45 P.2d 656 Ariz. 1935
Town of Flagstaff v. Gomez 202 P. 401 Ariz. 1921
Town of Flagstaff v. Gomez 202 P. 401 Ariz. 1921
He would profit just as much from his own wrong in the latter instance as in the former, and the fact that, under paragraph 3373 of the Eevised Statutes of 1913 (Civil Code) , 85 Pac.
Jennings v. Lister 195 P. 1113 Ariz. 1921
Jennings v. Lister 195 P. 1113 Ariz. 1921
Code) does not provide for the survival of the right of action for injuries suffered by deceased, but creates a new action for the wrongful death ( , 85 Pac.
Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson 195 P. 538 Ariz. 1921
Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson 195 P. 538 Ariz. 1921
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Conwell 190 P. 88 Ariz. 1920
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Conwell 190 P. 88 Ariz. 1920
Behringer v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. 149 P. 1065 Ariz. 1915
De Amado v. Friedman 89 P. 588 Ariz. 1907
De Amado v. Friedman 89 P. 588 Ariz. 1907

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by