Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite De Amado v. Friedman, 89 P. 588.

24 citing documents.

Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
*605 Katz’s , 195 P. 538 (1921), , 89 P. 588 (1907), , 85 P. 401 (1906), is misplaced.
Gibson v. Gunsch 714 P.2d 1311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In Re Milliman's Estate 406 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Milliman's Estate 406 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Sections 944 and 945, Rev.Code 1928; , 89 P. 588 ; , 85 P. 401 ; Phoenix Ry.
Womack v. Preach 165 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1946
Womack v. Preach 165 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1946
89 P. 588 ; Southern Pac.
Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. Askren 46 P.2d 1068 Ariz. 1935
Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. Askren 46 P.2d 1068 Ariz. 1935
156, 157 , in speaking of the age of the plaintiff who was injured by the explosion of a dynamite cap found by him on defendant’s premises, we used this language: “This court has held that negligence cannot be imputed to a child 4 years and 4 months old' ( , 89 Pac.
Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co. 45 P.2d 656 Ariz. 1935
Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co. 45 P.2d 656 Ariz. 1935
Sections 944 and 945, Rev. Code 1928; , 89 Pac.
Butler v. Rule 265 P. 757 Ariz. 1928
Butler v. Rule 265 P. 757 Ariz. 1928
McIver v. Allen 262 P. 5 Ariz. 1927
McIver v. Allen 262 P. 5 Ariz. 1927
Bruno v. Grande 251 P. 550 Ariz. 1926
Bruno v. Grande 251 P. 550 Ariz. 1926
Southwest Cotton Co. v. Clements 215 P. 156 Ariz. 1923
Southwest Cotton Co. v. Clements 215 P. 156 Ariz. 1923
This court has held that negligence cannot be imputed to a child four years and four months old ( , 89 Pac.
Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson 195 P. 538 Ariz. 1921
Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson 195 P. 538 Ariz. 1921
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Conwell 190 P. 88 Ariz. 1920
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Conwell 190 P. 88 Ariz. 1920
Behringer v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. 149 P. 1065 Ariz. 1915