Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re Mason, 805 P.2d 1012.

111 citing documents.

Havasu Springs Resort Co. v. La Paz County 18 P.3d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Bernal v. Loeks 997 P.2d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co. 3 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Boomer v. Frank 993 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
where the evidence or inferences would permit a jury to resolve a material issue in favor of either party, summary judgment is improper.”
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Elia v. Pifer 977 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
De Alfy Properties v. Pima County 985 P.2d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 953 P.2d 168 Ariz. 1998
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mandile 963 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(“[Ajppellate courts apply the same standard as that used by the trial court in ruling on the summary judgment in the first instance.”).
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. 935 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. 937 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp. 930 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc. 927 P.2d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Service Merchandise Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 937 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McDaniel v. Troy Design Services Co. 925 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
A presumption in favor of a community obligation arises “when either spouse incurs a debt during marriage for the benefit of the marital community.”
Prince v. City of Apache Junction 912 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Adams v. State 916 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 907 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
Hafner v. Beck 916 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Swanson v. Safeco Title Insurance 925 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Williams-Carter v. Maricopa County 903 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 887 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Continental Cas. Co. v. FARMERS INS. CO., ARIZONA 883 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. Aiken 877 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
Ward v. Mount Calvary Lutheran Church 873 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 875 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. 880 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-96 , -17 (Ct.App.1990); GM Development, 165 Ariz. at 5 , 795 P.2d at 831 .
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Merchants Bonding Co. v. Pima County 860 P.2d 510 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 857 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Iliff 854 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Iliff 854 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1993
In In re Mason, [ , ] (1991), the respondent was censured for, among other things, misrepresenting to a client that he had secured a settlement agreement, failing to prosecute his client’s case, and using his own personal funds as settlement funds.
Indian Village Shopping Center Investment Co. v. Kroger Co. 854 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kowske v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 863 P.2d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Baker v. Clover 864 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger 871 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
United Bank *163 v. Allyn

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by