Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Shaffer v. Territory of Arizona, 127 P. 746.
- State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
-
State v. Miller
491 P.2d 485
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
The issue of counsel’s , 297 P. 871, 872 (1931), , 127 P. 746, 748 (1912): “His [defendant’s] right to have counsel, and to have his counsel prepare his case for trial, is a substantial right, and to deny his counsel sufficient time in which to prepare the case is also the denial of a substantial right; and, under such circumstances, to have counsel appointed t
- State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Narten
407 P.2d 81
Ariz. 1965
127 P. 746 , we held that to deny counsel sufficient time to prepare the case is to deny defendant a substantial right.
- Everett v. State 356 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1960
-
Everett v. State
356 P.2d 394
Ariz. 1960
127 P. 746 ; 6 R.C.L., p. 545, and cases cited.
- Tang v. Avitable 264 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1953
- Tang v. Avitable 264 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1953
- Wilburn v. Reitman 91 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1939
- Wilburn v. Reitman 91 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1939
- Hash v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1936
- Hash v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1936
- Michener v. Standard Accident Insurance 47 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1935
- Michener v. Standard Accident Insurance 47 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1935
- Hunter v. State 30 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1934
- Hunter v. State 30 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1934
- McGinty v. Bass 12 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1932
- McGinty v. Bass 12 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1932
- Stirling v. State 297 P. 871 Ariz. 1931
-
Stirling v. State
297 P. 871
Ariz. 1931
“His right to have counsel, and to have his counsel prepare his case for trial,” , 127 Pac.
- B.W.L. Sam v. State 265 P. 609 Ariz. 1928
- B.W.L. Sam v. State 265 P. 609 Ariz. 1928
- Talley v. State 159 P. 59 Ariz. 1916
- Talley v. State 159 P. 59 Ariz. 1916
- Callaghan v. State 155 P. 308 Ariz. 1916
- Callaghan v. State 155 P. 308 Ariz. 1916