Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Young Chung v. State, 136 P. 631.
- State v. Jeffrey 463 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Jeffrey 463 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- State v. Fullen 404 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
State v. Fullen
404 P.2d 732
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
159 P. 59 (1916) ; , 136 P. 631 (1913); , 229 P. 1028 (1924).
- State v. Holden 352 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Holden
352 P.2d 705
Ariz. 1960
136 P. 631, 636 , the following: “* * * We think these authorities support the proposition that prejudice must be shown or sufficient ground must appear for presuming prejudice to authorize interference with the verdict on account of such matters.
- State v. Jordan 320 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1958
-
State v. Jordan
320 P.2d 446
Ariz. 1958
136 P. 631 , it was pointed out that appellant must show that he has been prejudiced by the alleged misconduct of a juror or the jury before he can predicate an appeal on the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial on such a ground, , 1
- State v. Love 266 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1954
-
State v. Love
266 P.2d 1079
Ariz. 1954
260 P. 188 , where a new trial was sought on the ground of newly discovered evidence the trial court’s refusaDto grant same was upheld because it appeared that the evidence relating to alibi was merely cumulative and impeaching, citing in support thereof Talley v. State, supra, , 136 P. 631 .
- Whitson v. State 181 P.2d 822 Ariz. 1947
-
Whitson v. State
181 P.2d 822
Ariz. 1947
928 ; , 136 P. 631 ; , 137 P. 550 ; Ewers’ Adm’r v. National Imp.
- State of Arizona v. Guldin 162 P.2d 907 Ariz. 1945
- State of Arizona v. Guldin 162 P.2d 907 Ariz. 1945
- Sullivan v. State of Arizona 55 P.2d 312 Ariz. 1936
- Sullivan v. State of Arizona 55 P.2d 312 Ariz. 1936
- Post v. State 15 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1932
- Post v. State 15 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1932
- Indian Fred v. State 282 P. 930 Ariz. 1929
- Indian Fred v. State 282 P. 930 Ariz. 1929
- Bradley v. State 279 P. 256 Ariz. 1929
- Bradley v. State 279 P. 256 Ariz. 1929
- Grijalva v. State 260 P. 188 Ariz. 1927
- Grijalva v. State 260 P. 188 Ariz. 1927
- Flowers v. State 229 P. 1028 Ariz. 1924
- Flowers v. State 229 P. 1028 Ariz. 1924
- Martinez v. State 176 P. 582 Ariz. 1918
-
Martinez v. State
176 P. 582
Ariz. 1918
“Under the law making the jury the sole judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight and effect to he given to their testimony, where, though the evidence is conflicting, there is substantial evidence in support of the jury’s finding, the verdict will not he disturbed.” , 136 Pac.
- Rain v. State 137 P. 550 Ariz. 1913