Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781.

89 citing documents.

Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise Valley 610 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1980
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise Valley 610 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1980
by such corporations; Provided further that classifications, rates, charges, rules, regulations, orders, and forms or systems prescribed or made by said Corporation Commission may from time to time be amended or repealed by such Commission.” (Emphasis added) Early in our history, we held that the Corporation Commission’s power was paramount, State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, , 138 P. 781 (1914), and that the legislature could not delegate powers possessed by the Corporation
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise Valley 610 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise Valley 610 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
While at one point in our history there were serious questions concerning the authority vested in the legislature to pass *455 laws affecting public service corporations, see State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914)
Scates v. Arizona Corp. Commission 578 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
City of Tucson v. Citizens Utilities Water Company 498 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
City of Tucson v. Citizens Utilities Water Company 498 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court 480 P.2d 988 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court 480 P.2d 988 Ariz. 1971
State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court 459 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1969
Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court 459 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1969
State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781 .
Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 422 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1967
Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 422 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1967
Statements made, as early as 1914, in the case of State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781 , are as follows: “Article 15 of our Constitution is unique in that no other state has given its Commission, by whatever name called, so extensive power and jurisdiction.
Tovrea v. San Xavier Rock & Sand Co. 417 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Tovrea v. San Xavier Rock & Sand Co. 417 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
and State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Company 294 P.2d 378 Ariz. 1956
Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Company 294 P.2d 378 Ariz. 1956
This court in construing these provisions of our constitution in the case of State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 1914, , 138 P. 781, 784 , said: “In order that the Corporation Commission might act intelligently, justly, and fairly between the public service corporations doing business in the state and the general public, section 14 was written into the Constitution * *.
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. 228 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1951
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. 228 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1951
The leading and original case on the subject is that of State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 786 .
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ralston 196 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1948
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ralston 196 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1948
The law-making power may enlarge the powers and extend the duties of the corporation commission, and may prescribe rules and regulations to govern proceedings instituted by and before it; but, until such rules and regulations are provided by law, the commission may make rules and regulations to govern such proceedings.” , 138 P. 781, 785 , after quoting article 3 of the constitution, we said: “ * * * The functions' of the Corporation Commission are not confined to any of the three departments na
Ethington v. Wright 189 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1948
Ethington v. Wright 189 P.2d 209 Ariz. 1948
The meaning and effect of these constitutional provisions were first dealt with comprehensively by this court in the case of State v. Tucson Gas & *390 Electric Light & Power Co., 1914, , 138 P. 781, 782 .
Garvey v. Trew 170 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1946
Garvey v. Trew 170 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1946
Light & P. Co., , 138 P. 781 .
Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound Lines 94 P.2d 443 Ariz. 1939
Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound Lines 94 P.2d 443 Ariz. 1939
” In support of its contention, the commission relies upon the express language of section 3, supra, , 138 Pac.
Crandall v. Town of Safford 56 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1936
Crandall v. Town of Safford 56 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1936
Since the Constitution (art. 15, § 3) coniers on the Corporation Commission the power to prescribe rates for public service corporations, except those municipally owned and managed ( , 138 Pac.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State 201 P. 632 Ariz. 1921
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State 201 P. 632 Ariz. 1921
Johnson v. Betts 188 P. 271 Ariz. 1920
Johnson v. Betts 188 P. 271 Ariz. 1920
Phoenix Railway Co. v. Lount 187 P. 933 Ariz. 1920
Phoenix Railway Co. v. Lount 187 P. 933 Ariz. 1920
The case of the State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 Pac.
Yuma Gas, Light & Water Co. v. City of Yuma 178 P. 26 Ariz. 1919
Yuma Gas, Light & Water Co. v. City of Yuma 178 P. 26 Ariz. 1919
Arizona Eastern Railroad v. State 171 P. 906 Ariz. 1918
Arizona Eastern Railroad v. State 171 P. 906 Ariz. 1918
In the ease of State v. Tucson Gas & Electric Co., , 138 Pac.