Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Skaggs v. State, 207 P. 877.

34 citing documents.

Hoyle v. Superior Court 778 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Hoyle v. Superior Court 778 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-02 , 207 P. 877, 880 (1922).
Allen v. Sullivan 677 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Allen v. Sullivan 677 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
The only other decision invalidating legislation for violation of § 13 , 207 P. 877 (1922), holding that provisions of a civil nature relating to bastardy were inconsistent with a title stating that the provisions related to an “act to establish a penal code.” No such inconsistencies appear in this case.
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 416 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Superior Court of Pima County 416 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Green v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 415 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Green v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 415 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Mejia 399 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1965
State v. Mejia 399 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1965
McGuire v. State 326 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1958
McGuire v. State 326 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1958
207 P. 877, 879 , as authority for the fact that we took our bastardy statute from Minnesota and that we took it with the interpretation theretofore given to it by the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
State v. Hicks 211 P.2d 473 Ariz. 1949
State v. Hicks 211 P.2d 473 Ariz. 1949
207 P. 877, 880 , that inasmuch as we took our bastardy act from the state of Minnesota that we adopted it with the well-settled construction placed upon it by the courts of that state to the effect that the proceedings were civil in nature (citing many cases).
State of Arizona v. Nerini 151 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1944
State of Arizona v. Nerini 151 P.2d 983 Ariz. 1944
State of Arizona v. Moore 58 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1936
State of Arizona v. Moore 58 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1936
Ellery v. State 22 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1933
Ellery v. State 22 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1933
Sims v. Moeur 19 P.2d 679 Ariz. 1933
Sims v. Moeur 19 P.2d 679 Ariz. 1933
Hancock v. State 254 P. 225 Ariz. 1927
Hancock v. State 254 P. 225 Ariz. 1927
“Perhaps the greater number of courts take the view announced by the Supreme Court of Washington.” *395 , 207 Pac.
Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co. 253 P. 435 Ariz. 1927
Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co. 253 P. 435 Ariz. 1927
Gibson v. Gordon 246 P. 1036 Ariz. 1926
Gibson v. Gordon 246 P. 1036 Ariz. 1926
State v. Davey 232 P. 884 Ariz. 1925
State v. Davey 232 P. 884 Ariz. 1925
Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co. 218 P. 139 Ariz. 1923
Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co. 218 P. 139 Ariz. 1923