Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Dorsey v. State, 213 P. 1011.
- State v. Tisnado 458 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Tisnado
458 P.2d 957
Ariz. 1969
The rule and its exceptions aré , 213 P. 1011 .
- State v. White 416 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. White
416 P.2d 597
Ariz. 1966
86 A.L.R.2d 1120 ; , 213 P. 1011 .
- State v. Locks 382 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1963
-
State v. Locks
382 P.2d 241
Ariz. 1963
86 A.L.R.2d 1120 ; , 213 P. 1011 .
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Vallejos 358 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1960
- State v. Vallejos 358 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1960
- State v. Little 350 P.2d 756 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Little
350 P.2d 756
Ariz. 1960
-144 , 213 P. 1011 , 1012: “The general rule is that, in the prosecution of one accused of a particular offense, evidence showing or tending to show the commission by accused of another crime entirely distinct and independent of that for which he is on trial, even though it be a crime of the same class, is neither
- State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
- State v. Thomas 229 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1951
- State v. Thomas 229 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1951
- State v. Martinez 198 P.2d 115 Ariz. 1948
- State v. Martinez 198 P.2d 115 Ariz. 1948
- Taylor v. State of Arizona 97 P.2d 543 Ariz. 1940
-
Taylor v. State of Arizona
97 P.2d 543
Ariz. 1940
There is no question but that the general rule is “that, in the prosecution of one accused of a particular offense, evidence showing or tending to show the commission by accused of another crime entirely distinct and independent of that for which he is on trial, even though it be a crime of the same class, is neither relevant nor admissible.” Pac.
- Judd v. State 16 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1932
-
Judd v. State
16 P.2d 720
Ariz. 1932
The trial court in giving it was but following the well-recognized rule with respect to evidence of this character, Pac.
- California State Life Insurance v. Fuqua 10 P.2d 958 Ariz. 1932
- California State Life Insurance v. Fuqua 10 P.2d 958 Ariz. 1932
- Greve v. State 285 P. 274 Ariz. 1930
- Greve v. State 285 P. 274 Ariz. 1930
- MacIas v. State 283 P. 711 Ariz. 1929
- MacIas v. State 283 P. 711 Ariz. 1929
- Vigil v. State 262 P. 14 Ariz. 1927
- Vigil v. State 262 P. 14 Ariz. 1927
- Lewis v. State 256 P. 1048 Ariz. 1927
- Lewis v. State 256 P. 1048 Ariz. 1927
- Holder v. State 253 P. 629 Ariz. 1927
- Holder v. State 253 P. 629 Ariz. 1927