Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hadley v. State, 212 P. 458.

44 citing documents.

State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
P. 458 (1923); , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
212 P. 458 ; , 243 P. 601 ; 3 Wigmore Evidence 538, § 980 (3d ed. 1940).
State v. Pearce 527 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Pearce 527 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
212 P. 458 (1923), and Udall’s Arizona Law of Evidence.
State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
State v. Prewitt 452 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1969
State v. Prewitt 452 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1969
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
Cf., , 212 P. 458 (1923).
State v. Dodd 418 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1966
State v. Dodd 418 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1966
State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
212 P. 458 (1923) ; *318 , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
212 P. 458 (1923) ; , 208 P. 412 (1922).
State v. Eddington 386 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1963
State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
It is well settled that “clothing may be properly admitted as evidence in cases * * * as a part of the res gestae, or as forming a link in the chain where the evidence is circumstantial.” , 212 P. 458, 460 .
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
212 P. 458 ; , 208 P. 412 .
State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
While it is well settled in this jurisdiction that when a defendant offers himself as a witness he may be examined on whether he has suffered a previous conviction of a felony, , ; , 212 P. 458 , it is also equally well settled that a prosecuting officer, in order to impeach him as a witness, cannot engage in questioning which casts insinuations without being prepared and able to prove the insinuations, , .
State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
Hadley v. State, 1923, , 212 P. 458 .
State v. Telavera 261 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1953
State v. Telavera 261 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1953
State v. Harris 238 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1951
State v. Harris 238 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1951
212 P. 458 ; , 243 P. 601 ; 3 Wigmore Evidence 538, § 980 (3d ed. 1940).
Cochrane v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 658 Ariz. 1936
Cochrane v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 658 Ariz. 1936
Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
Johnson v. State 264 P. 1083 Ariz. 1928
Johnson v. State 264 P. 1083 Ariz. 1928
Wilson v. State 237 P. 950 Ariz. 1925
Wilson v. State 237 P. 950 Ariz. 1925