Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hadley v. State, 212 P. 458.
- State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
-
State v. Sustaita
583 P.2d 239
Ariz. 1978
P. 458 (1923); , 208 P. 412 (1922).
- State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
-
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court
545 P.2d 946
Ariz. 1976
212 P. 458 ; , 243 P. 601 ; 3 Wigmore Evidence 538, § 980 (3d ed. 1940).
- State v. Pearce 527 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
State v. Pearce
527 P.2d 297
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
212 P. 458 (1923), and Udall’s Arizona Law of Evidence.
- State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Van Winkle 478 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Prewitt 452 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Prewitt 452 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Bowen
449 P.2d 603
Ariz. 1969
Cf., , 212 P. 458 (1923).
- State v. Dodd 418 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Dodd 418 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Goodyear
404 P.2d 397
Ariz. 1965
212 P. 458 (1923) ; *318 , 208 P. 412 (1922).
- State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
-
State v. Corrales
391 P.2d 563
Ariz. 1964
212 P. 458 (1923) ; , 208 P. 412 (1922).
- State v. Eddington 386 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
-
State v. Loftis
363 P.2d 585
Ariz. 1961
It is well settled that “clothing may be properly admitted as evidence in cases * * * as a part of the res gestae, or as forming a link in the chain where the evidence is circumstantial.” , 212 P. 458, 460 .
- State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Holman
356 P.2d 27
Ariz. 1960
212 P. 458 ; , 208 P. 412 .
- State v. Stago 312 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1957
-
State v. Stago
312 P.2d 160
Ariz. 1957
While it is well settled in this jurisdiction that when a defendant offers himself as a witness he may be examined on whether he has suffered a previous conviction of a felony, , ; , 212 P. 458 , it is also equally well settled that a prosecuting officer, in order to impeach him as a witness, cannot engage in questioning which casts insinuations without being prepared and able to prove the insinuations, , .
- State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
-
State v. Polan
278 P.2d 432
Ariz. 1954
Hadley v. State, 1923, , 212 P. 458 .
- State v. Telavera 261 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1953
- State v. Telavera 261 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1953
- State v. Harris 238 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1951
-
State v. Harris
238 P.2d 957
Ariz. 1951
212 P. 458 ; , 243 P. 601 ; 3 Wigmore Evidence 538, § 980 (3d ed. 1940).
- Cochrane v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 658 Ariz. 1936
- Cochrane v. State of Arizona 59 P.2d 658 Ariz. 1936
- Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
- Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
- Johnson v. State 264 P. 1083 Ariz. 1928
- Johnson v. State 264 P. 1083 Ariz. 1928
- Wilson v. State 237 P. 950 Ariz. 1925
- Wilson v. State 237 P. 950 Ariz. 1925