DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Douglass v. State, 33 P.2d 985.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Richard Lee Palmer 270 P.3d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
  • State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court 941 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court 941 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    ( , ) (state mental hospital records in defendant’s murder trial); , (military discharge forms were hearsay and not admissible to show mental defect); Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n v. Neale, -49 , -11 (1934) (industrial commission records not admissible to show how injury occurred).
  • State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
    404(b) (allowing other acts evidence to show motive); Edward J. Imwinkelried, Uncharged Misconduct Evidence §§ 3:15-3:16 (1984 & Supp.1995); -89 , (holding that evidence of a prior murder was relevant to show a' motive of concealment in the charged murder).
  • State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
    State v. Schmid, supra, , , , 240 P. 863 , cert.
  • State v. Hannon 425 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Hannon 425 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
    the defendant was found guilty of the murder of an elderly prospector, Ralph Hart, who the defendant claimed he killed in self-defense.
  • Simpson v. Heiderich 419 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • State v. Hanna 409 P.2d 47 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Hanna 409 P.2d 47 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Cumbo 396 P.2d 11 Ariz. 1964
  • State v. Cumbo 396 P.2d 11 Ariz. 1964
  • State v. Little 350 P.2d 756 Ariz. 1960
  • State v. Little 350 P.2d 756 Ariz. 1960
    256 P. 1048 ; , ; , ; , ; 2 Wigmore on Evidence §§ 300, 304 (3rd ed.).
  • State v. Stracuzzi 289 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1955
  • State v. Stracuzzi 289 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1955
    Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n v. Neale, , ; , .
  • State v. Voeckell 210 P.2d 972 Ariz. 1949
  • State v. Voeckell 210 P.2d 972 Ariz. 1949
    we held that the judge's statement to the jury during their deliberations that he would not be present until late the following day to receive a verdict, accompanied by a warning that he did not wish to coerce or influence the jury, was not prejudicial or erroneous There is definitely a split in author
  • State v. Singleton 182 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1947
  • State v. Singleton 182 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1947
    285 P. 274 ; , 262 P. 14 ; , ; , 161 P. 878 ; , .
  • Drake v. State of Arizona 85 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1939
  • Drake v. State of Arizona 85 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1939
  • Doughty v. State 33 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1934