H-198-2 Precedential Processed

Randall v. Eyman

Arizona Supreme Court · Filed March 28, 1967 · 425 P.2d 570

Cited by

State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp Gray 372 P.3d 999 Ariz. 2016
State v. Chabolla-Hinojosa 965 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Gessler 690 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Kiser 546 P.2d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Rubino 531 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Vitale 530 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Ballinger 520 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1974
State v. Mendoza 511 P.2d 627 Ariz. 1973
State v. McKinney 501 P.2d 378 Ariz. 1972
State v. Bartky 493 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Chudy 492 P.2d 402 Ariz. 1972
State v. Arce 483 P.2d 1395 Ariz. 1971

all 16 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Randall v. Eyman 101 Ariz. 343

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. Petitioner has filed his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus setting forth that this court had on November 3, 1966, entered a per curiam order setting aside the judgment and commitment of the Superior Court of Pima County and directing that the custody of petitioner be transferred from the State Prison at Florence, Arizona to the Sheriff of Pima County for re-sentencing, 101 Ariz. 343 , 419 P.2d 522 . The petitioner contends that by reason of the unreasonable delay of now nearly five months in complying with the judgment of this court he should be discharged. We agree. There being no reasonable excuse appearing under the facts of this case for the delay it is hereby ordered that this Writ of Habeas Corpus issue and that the petitioner be discharged forthwith.