Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission, 535 P.2d 623.

38 citing documents.

chas/liberty v. Lara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
chas/liberty v. Lara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Martinez v. Shc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martinez v. Shc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, (nonphysical event may constitute an “accident”).
Munoz v. fry's/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Munoz v. fry's/sedgwick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
May v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Fund v. Industrial Comm’n, , (nonphysical event may constitute an “accident”).
State v. Ellevan 880 P.2d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Ellevan 880 P.2d 139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(Dentist’s refusal to estimate probable future dental expenses did not prevent fact-finder from assessing probable expenses based on the evidence as a whole.); State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Comm’n, , (In dispute over work-related cause of claimant’s heart condition, because “positive knowledge [could] not be had as to causation,” the administrative law judge was not obliged .to give, greater weight to an opinion expressed in terms of probability than to another opinion expressed in t
Mercante v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 735 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Mercante v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 735 P.2d 1384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Tipton v. Industrial Commission 734 P.2d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Tipton v. Industrial Commission 734 P.2d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
(award set aside because hearing officer ignored medical testimony that he mistakenly considered too speculative to support an award).
American Insurance v. Industrial Commission 697 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
(award set aside because hearing officer ignored medical testimony that he mistakenly considered too speculative to support an award).
Walters v. Industrial Commission 658 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Walters v. Industrial Commission 658 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
1 , for example, the Commission’s hearing officer ignored certain medical testimony because he considered it too speculative to support an award for compensability.
Wilco Aviation v. Garfield 599 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Wilco Aviation v. Garfield 599 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Janis v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
610 , , Hume v. Industrial Commission, 18 Ariz.App.
Janis v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
31 , when medical evidence peculiarly within the realm of scientific knowledge is stated purely in terms of possibilities, that evidence is insufficient to sustain the claimant’s burden of proof.
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
578 , , it is clear from a review of all the medical and *583 lay testimony there is ample support for the hearing officer’s finding that Slayton’s disease and condition deteriorated without any cause being legally attributable to his working conditions.
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Riley v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Riley v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
See also State Compensation Fund v, Fickett, , Bluma v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona, 7 Ariz.App.