Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Haddad, 627 P.2d 221.

40 citing documents.

In Re McVay 158 P.3d 198 Ariz. 2007
In Re McVay 158 P.3d 198 Ariz. 2007
“[O]ur goal in imposing sanctions is to protect the public and foster judicial integrity - not to punish.” ( ); see also R. Comm’n Judicial Conduct 5.5 Taking into account the financial impact that a suspension would have on a judge would not “serve the objective of guarding the public’s interest.”6
In Re Nelson 86 P.3d 374 Ariz. 2004
In Re Nelson 86 P.3d 374 Ariz. 2004
In Re Carpenter 17 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2001
In Re Carpenter 17 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2001
¶ 7 In considering the appropriate discipline to impose for violations of judicial standards of conduct, our goal is “not to punish the individual judge, but to maintain the high standards of the judiciary and the proper administration of justice.”
In Re Flournoy 990 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1999
In Re Flournoy 990 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1999
We do, however, give serious consideration to the Commission’s findings, , particularly when questions of credibility are involved.
Matter of Fleischman 933 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1997
Matter of Fleischman 933 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1997
In Re Matter of Braun 883 P.2d 996 Ariz. 1994
In Re Matter of Braun 883 P.2d 996 Ariz. 1994
See Ariz. Const, art. 6.1; -92 , -23 (1981).
In Re Jett 882 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1994
In Re Jett 882 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1994
In Re Lorona 875 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1994
In Re Lorona 875 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1994
see Ariz. Const, art. 6.1, § 4.
Matter of Peck 867 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Peck 867 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1994
1 See *285 Ariz. Const, art. 6.1; -92 , -23 (1981).
Matter of Gumaer 867 P.2d 850 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Gumaer 867 P.2d 850 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Anderson 814 P.2d 773 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Anderson 814 P.2d 773 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Lehman 812 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Lehman 812 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1991
In Re Lockwood 804 P.2d 738 Ariz. 1990
In Re Lockwood 804 P.2d 738 Ariz. 1990
Matter of Marquardt 778 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Marquardt 778 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Ackel 745 P.2d 92 Ariz. 1987
Matter of Ackel 745 P.2d 92 Ariz. 1987
-98 , -29 (1981) (emphasis added), quoting Geiler v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 10 Cal.3d 270, 283-84 , , 110 Cal.Rptr.
Matter of Biggins 737 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1987
Matter of Biggins 737 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1987
Matter of Walker 736 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1987
Matter of Walker 736 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1987
1 FACTS “[I]n judicial discipline matters, we must make an independent evaluation, or de novo review on the record, of the evidence and recommendations of the Commission on Judicial Qualifications.”
Matter of Hendrix 701 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1985
Matter of Hendrix 701 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1985
In Re Weeks 658 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1983
In Re Weeks 658 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1983