Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ceja, 612 P.2d 491.

67 citing documents.

  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gerlaugh 659 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
    796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980)
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
    State v. Poland, supra, 132 Ariz. at 285 , 645 P.2d at 800 ; State v. (Ricky) Tison, , , State v. Clark, supra, 126 Ariz. at 436 , 616 P.2d at 896
  • State v. Woratzeck 657 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Woratzeck 657 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
  • Explained State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
    And in any event the killing of Christopher Lyons, who could pose no conceivable threat to the defendants, by itself compels the conclusion that it was committed in a depraved manner.” , we explained the meaning of the terms embraced by (E)(6): “The aspect of cruelty involves the pain and the mental and physical distress visited upon the victims.
  • State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    Our Supreme Court in a first-degree murder case, , upheld a finding of an especially heinous and depraved killing where the defendant in a “barrage of violence” continued to shoot and abuse his victims even after he had killed them.
  • State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
    Heinous and depraved go to the mental state and attitude of the perpetrator as reflected in his words and actions.”
  • State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
    State v. Richmond, supra; , State v. Watson, supra