Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ceja, 612 P.2d 491.
- State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gerlaugh 659 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Zaragoza
659 P.2d 22
Ariz. 1983
796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980)
- State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Gretzler
659 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1983
State v. Poland, supra, 132 Ariz. at 285 , 645 P.2d at 800 ; State v. (Ricky) Tison, , , State v. Clark, supra, 126 Ariz. at 436 , 616 P.2d at 896
- State v. Woratzeck 657 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Woratzeck 657 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
-
Explained
State v. Tison
633 P.2d 335
Ariz. 1981
And in any event the killing of Christopher Lyons, who could pose no conceivable threat to the defendants, by itself compels the conclusion that it was committed in a depraved manner.” , we explained the meaning of the terms embraced by (E)(6): “The aspect of cruelty involves the pain and the mental and physical distress visited upon the victims.
- State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
State v. Inglish
631 P.2d 1102
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Our Supreme Court in a first-degree murder case, , upheld a finding of an especially heinous and depraved killing where the defendant in a “barrage of violence” continued to shoot and abuse his victims even after he had killed them.
- State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Bishop
622 P.2d 478
Ariz. 1980
Heinous and depraved go to the mental state and attitude of the perpetrator as reflected in his words and actions.”
- State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Clark
616 P.2d 888
Ariz. 1980
State v. Richmond, supra; , State v. Watson, supra