Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund, 943 P.2d 793.

30 citing documents.

Vasquez v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Silverman v. Ahcccs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Fund, (a party’s express, in-court concession “has the effect of a confessory pleading”) (citation omitted).
Sembower v. Sembower Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Monroe v. Az Acreage 443 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fund, (quoting IX John H. Wigmore, Evidence § 2588 (1981)) (emphasis added).
Ribitzki v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Fund, (describing judicial admissions).
Scottsdale v. Fortiff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fund, ¶ 42 (App. 1998) (“The rules regarding disclosure are born out of a policy that the facts and issues to be litigated must be fairly exposed.”).
O'Connor v. Arizona Medical Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund, (“A judicial admission is .
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley 313 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley 313 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Fund, , (“The purpose of disclosure is ...
Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co. 262 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fund, , 439-40, , 799-801 (App. 1997).
Golonka v. General Motors Corp. 65 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Golonka v. General Motors Corp. 65 P.3d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Hernandez v. State 35 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Hernandez v. State 35 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Fund, , (“The purpose of disclosure is ...
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Fund, , (“Even though the Fund was created by statute and has assumed [the insolvent insurer’s] obligations because of its statutory duty, the essential nature of this action remains one sounding in contract.”).
State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fund, , (a disclosure statement is not a judicial admission; a party’s disclosure statement can be amended).
Macintyre v. Industrial Commission 960 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Macintyre v. Industrial Commission 960 P.2d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fund, , (Noyes, J., dissenting in part).
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
Fund, , (“Even though the Fund was created by statute ...
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARIZONA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE GUARANTY FUND, a political subdivision of the Department of Insurance of the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellant.