Cited by

See In re MH2007-001236, ¶ 12 n.3 (App. 2008) (deciding the merits of the appeal from an expired involuntary treatment order because of the patient’s interests at stake as a result of having that order on her record).

2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008).

Mental Health No. MH 2007-001236, n.3 (App. 2008).

2007-001236, ¶ 29 (App. 2008) (clear and convincing evidence of medical issue requires “evidence expressed to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or probability”).

No. MH 2007-001236, ¶ 20 (App. 2008)).

2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008).

See In re MH2007-001236, ¶ 20 (App. 2008).

Mental Health No. MH 2007-001236, Dr. Colon did not testify and therefore the deficiencies in his affidavit could not have been similarly cured.7 Thus, even assuming Dr. Madan’s testimony cured the deficiencies in his affidavit, his “sole affidavit is not enough to meet the statutory burden.” Id.

See In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008).

2007-001236, ¶ 12 n.3 (App. 2008).

See In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008).

See In re MH2011-000914, ¶ 6, n.5 (App. 2012) (citing In re MH2007-001236, ¶ 12, n.3 (App. 2008)).

Accordingly, “the record must contain all statutorily required information, including medical evidence expressed to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or probability to prove the elements for involuntary treatment.” See In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 29 (App. 2008).

2007-001236, ¶ 12 n.3 (App. 2008).

2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008).

In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 (App. 2008) (citations omitted).

2007-001236, -70, ¶ 30, -28 (App. 2008) (expert’s failure to use “magic word or phrase such as probability is not determinative”) (citation omitted).

Mental Health No. MH 2007-001236, (to support involuntary treatment order, physician’s opinion must be “expressed to a reasonable degree of medical certainty”).

§ 36-540(A).2 A trial court’s factual findings supporting a civil commitment order “will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence.” In re MH 2007–001236, ¶ 15

“[T]he testimony from each physician must be to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or probability as to the statutory elements before a court may find that the clear and convincing standard [required to order involuntary treatment] has been met.” In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 29

§ 36– 540(A); In re MH 2007–001236, ¶ 15

2007-001236, , 165 n. 3, ¶ 12, , 423 n. 3 (App.2008).

In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 , ( ¶ 8 , In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 , Little v. All Phoenix S. Cmty.

In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 , (citations omitted).

See In re Maricopa County Mental Health No. MH 2007-001236