Brooker v. Hunter
The holding in the court’s own words
After reviewing the entire record, together with the additional depositions, we conclude that the decision of the Court of Appeals was correct.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we work.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Brooker v. Hunter 528 P.2d 1269
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: This case comes before us on a petition to review the decision of the Court of Ap *579 peals affirming the granting of summary judgment in favor of two physicians in a medical malpractice case. 22 Ariz.App. 510 , 528 P.2d 1269 (1974). After review was accepted, this Court granted the motion of the plaintiff-appellant to supplement the record with two additional depositions which inadvertently had not been sent forward from the superi- or court. After reviewing the entire record, together with the additional depositions, we conclude that the decision of the Court of Appeals was correct. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is approved and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.