No. 14391-PR
Precedential
Processed
Sarwark v. Thorneycroft
Cited by
- SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 323 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. 2014
- Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit Board 319 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. 2014
- STANT v. CITY OF MARICOPA EMPLOYEE MERIT BOARD Ariz. Ct. App. 2014
- Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 Ariz. Ct. App. 2012
- Berry v. Superior Court 788 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. 1989
- Tempe Life Care Village, Inc. v. City of Tempe 714 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. 1985
- Todd v. Todd 670 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. 1983
- Burnett v. Walter 660 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. 1982
- Pesqueira v. Pima County Assessor 650 P.2d 1237 Ariz. Ct. App. 1982
- Pace v. Pace 626 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. 1981
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Sarwark v. Thorneycroft 596 P.2d 1173
- Fumusa v. ARIZONA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY 545 P.2d 432
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: The decision of the Court of Appeals in Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, et al., 123 Ariz. 1 , 596 P.2d 1173 (1979), is approved for the reasons therein stated. The decision in Fumusa v. State Board of Pharmacy, 25 Ariz.App. 584, 545 P.2d 432 (1976), is disapproved.