Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Guardianship of Styer, 536 P.2d 717.

44 citing documents.

State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge.” Id.; (“The fact that a judge may have an opinion as to the 9 STATE v. ALVAREZ BOJORQUEZ Decision of the Court merits of the cause or a strong feeling about the type of litigation involved, does not make the judge biased
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Horst v. Horst Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“The fact that a judge may have an opinion as to the merits of the cause or a strong feeling about the type of litigation involved, does not make the judge biased or prejudiced.”).
State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
This court has defined bias as “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will, or undue friendship or favoritism, towards one of the litigants.”
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
e has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.”5 ¶20 A party asserting judicial bias must overcome a strong presumption that trial judges are free from bias and prejudice and “prov[e] ‘a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will, or undue friendship or favoritism, towards one of the litigants.’” ¶ 22 (2003) ().
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Buttita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Specifically, the moving party must establish “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will, or undue friendship or favoritism, towards one of the litigants.”
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Kuder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Kuder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Judicial bias is “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will” or “undue friendship or favoritism[ ] towards one of the litigants.”
In the Matter of Lisa M. Aubuchon 309 P.3d 886 Ariz. 2013
In the Matter of Lisa M. Aubuchon 309 P.3d 886 Ariz. 2013
(“The fact that a judge may have an opinion as to the merits of the cause or a strong feeling about the type of litigation involved, does not make the judge biased or prejudiced.”); cf. Ariz. R. Sup.
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
"Overcoming this burden means proving `a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will, or undue friendship or favoritism, towards one of the litigants.'" Cropper, , 68 P.3d at 411
State v. Cropper 68 P.3d 407 Ariz. 2003
Brush Wellman, Inc. v. Lee 996 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Brush Wellman, Inc. v. Lee 996 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
(rejecting claim that Rule 42(f) “gave an additional peremptory challenge as a matter of right”).
Mervyn's v. Superior Court 879 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Mervyn's v. Superior Court 879 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Peralta 856 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Peralta 856 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Emanuel 768 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Emanuel 768 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In , our Court of Appeals defined judicial bias as “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will,” or “undue friendship or favoritism towards one of the litigants.” Judge McDonald’s actions gave an appearance of “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will” towards the defendant.
State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
“Bias and prejudice means a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will, or undue friendship or favoritism, towards one of the litigants.”
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
1498 , 55 L.Ed.2d 524 (1978) ( , ).
State v. Brown 602 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1979
State v. Brown 602 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1979
In , our Court of Appeals defined judicial bias as “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will,” or “undue friendship or favoritism towards one of the litigants.” Judge McDonald’s actions gave an appearance of “a hostile feeling or spirit of ill-will” towards the defendant.
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Christoffel 566 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Christoffel 566 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
On June 9, 1972, the probate court removed Mr. Schwager as guardian for failure to file accountings and in 1975 ( , ), we affirmed the judgment surcharging Mr. Schwager in the sum of $378,789.62.
Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County 558 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County 558 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
The facts of the guardian’s misconduct can be found in the case of