Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Thompson's Estate, 398 P.2d 926.

30 citing documents.

Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
24, 28 , In re Thompson’s Estate
McKillip v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 945 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
McKillip v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 945 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
*63 NOTICE OF APPEAL According to In re Thompson’s Estate, , the denial of a motion for JNOV is not an appeal-able order.
Styles v. Ceranski 916 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Styles v. Ceranski 916 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In re Thompson’s Estate, , (citing 66 C.J.S.
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Evans v. Liston 568 P.2d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Evans v. Liston 568 P.2d 1116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ross v. Duke 569 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ross v. Duke 569 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
247 , In re Thompson’s Estate
King v. O'Rielly Motor Company 494 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
King v. O'Rielly Motor Company 494 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Miller v. Western Farms Investment Co. 492 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Miller v. Western Farms Investment Co. 492 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In Re Estate of Frick 475 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fahringer v. Pierce 475 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
In Re Estate of Frick 475 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Fahringer v. Pierce 475 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Moore v. Holbrook 433 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Moore v. Holbrook 433 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Re Pitt’s Estate, , ” In Re Thompson’s Estate
Butler v. Wehrley 425 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Butler v. Wehrley 425 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to sustain the verdict and if there is any substantial evidence from which reasonable men could have found the ultimate facts to be such as to sustain the verdict, the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be denied.” In re Thompson’s Estate, 23
State ex rel. Herman v. Southern Arizona Land Co. 424 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State ex rel. Herman v. Southern Arizona Land Co. 424 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Cole v. Gerhart 423 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Cole v. Gerhart 423 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
We have previously expressed ourselves on the subject of the trial court’s granting a new trial as to all issues in In re Thompson’s Estate
Associates Finance Corporation v. Scott 411 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Associates Finance Corporation v. Scott 411 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
§ 12-2101; In re Thompson’s Estate