Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Golden v. Superior Court, 447 P.2d 560.

17 citing documents.

Johnson v. Mofford 975 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
468, 473, (“On appeal it is our duty to presume that the trial court acted properly.”).
State v. Nunez 806 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1991
-73 , -65 (1968), and held that an earlier judgment of acquittal was binding in a later prosecution if common factual issues were actually adjudicated in the prior proceeding.
State v. Shuler 780 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Terrell 753 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Geschwind 666 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Berry 650 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Williams 639 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. De La Ossa 623 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Tamplin 613 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
and State v. Norgard, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Sardo 543 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1975
Application of Stone 481 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , , Di Orio v. City of Scottsdale, *112 2 Ariz.App.
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Brown v. Brown 459 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
we held that when the causes of action are different, a judgment in the first action is conclusive only to such issues as were actually litigated and adjudicated in the first action.
State v. Valenzuela 447 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
(released simultaneously with this opinion).