Hein v. Nutt
Cited by
- Beck v. Neville Ariz. 2024
- Mealey v. Arndt 76 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. 2003
- Larue v. Kosich 187 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1947
- In Re McDonnell's Estate 179 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1947
- Cleveland v. McDonnell 179 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1947
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hunt v. Campbell 169 P. 596
- Sarakoff v. Six Companies, Inc. 59 P.2d 302
- Greer v. Frost 20 P.2d 301
- Galbraith v. Parker 153 P. 283
Opinion text
STANFORD, Chief Justice. A rehearing was granted and certain errors appearing in our original opinion have now been corrected in the permanent printed reports. On the motion for rehearing plaintiff-appellant complains of our statement (which is fully supported by the record) that the plaintiff Hein had a lease in 1940 from the State of Arizona covering section 36. Possibly his silent partners, the D’Arrizo brothers, also may have had an interest therein. However, this whole question is purely academic for it can have no possible bearing on the establishment of the disputed section corner. As corrected, our opinion of March 31, 1947, shall remain in full force and effect. LaPRADE and UDALL, JJ., concurring.