Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McCall, 677 P.2d 920.

93 citing documents.

State v. Robinson 796 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1990
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Stabler 783 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
Proc., 17 A.R.S.; , cert.
State v. Ikirt 770 P.2d 1159 Ariz. 1989
State v. Lee 774 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Because such a waiver constitutes abandonment of the claim, , , cert.
State v. McCall 770 P.2d 1165 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
Correll, 148 Ariz. at 480-81 , 715 P.2d at 733 ; , cert.
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
Rule 31.13(c)(l)(iv) Ariz.R.Crim P., 17 A.R.S.; , cert.
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
See Rule 31.-13c(l)(iv), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.; , cert.
State v. Holder 745 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Stuck 739 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Tyrrell 733 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Edwards 739 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Bojorquez 729 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980); or intended victims, , , cert.
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
State v. Anzivino 716 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Johnson 710 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1985
-61 , -34 (1983); , cert.
State v. Sparks 708 P.2d 732 Ariz. 1985
State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
See State v. Bracy, supra; , , cert.
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
We recently reviewed our cases where we have upheld the finding of this aggravating circumstance and concluded that, in each case, “the murderous act itself put other people in a zone of danger.” , cert.
State v. Rosthenhausler 711 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); , , cert.
State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
2243, 2249 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140, 149 (1977)
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
Rule 403, Arizona Rules of Evidence, 17A A.R.S.
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
See State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. *405 147, and cases cited therein.
State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Newman 688 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Smith 687 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
(slitting of throat after “execution-style” murders is depraved because it was done to send a “message” to others).
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gortarez 686 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1984
State v. James 685 P.2d 1293 Ariz. 1984
(state may elicit this testimony on direct examination), and the claim is without merit.
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
State v. Frustino 689 P.2d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Turner 687 P.2d 1225 Ariz. 1984
Accord, , citing Cruz, supra; , 152
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
Kpnx Broadcasting v. Superior Court, Etc. 678 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1984
Kpnx Broadcasting v. Superior Court, Etc. 678 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1984
KPNX Broadcasting Co. v. Superior Court 678 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by