DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Monaghan v. Kennerdell, 227 P.2d 227.

27 citing documents.

  • Whiles v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Nor does the law of the case doctrine apply to matters “expressly reserved” or to decisions that are “ambiguous and uncertain.” In re Monaghan’s Estate
  • Parmeley v. Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Taraska v. Taraska Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (quoting In re Monaghan’s Estate, ).
  • State of Arizona v. James Darrell Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
    in the same case, provided the facts and issues are substantially the same as those on which the first decision rested’”), quoting In re Monaghan’s Estate, 71 Ariz. 334, 336
  • State v. Bocharski 189 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2008
    (quoting In re Monaghan’s Estate, ).
  • In Re the Commitment of Conn 85 P.3d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
    See King; In re Monaghan’s Estate
  • Commitment of Jerry Michael Conn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
    See King ; In re Monaghan’s Estate
  • Davis v. Davis 985 P.2d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
    It reflects the need for “an end to litigation and a final decision that parties can rely on.” Monaghan’s Estate
  • Samaritan Health System v. Caldwell 957 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    Again, in In re Monaghan’s Estate, , the court stated that the survivor takes one-half of the community property in her own right as owner and not as heir but that the property is subject to the community debts.
  • State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
    Monaghan’s Estate, , (citations omitted); see also 5 Am.Jur.2d Appeal and Error § 744 (1962); Annotation, Erroneous Decision as Law of the Case on Subsequent Appellate Review, 87 A.L.R.2d 271 , 275 (1963).
  • In the Matter of Estates of Spear 845 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    See In re Foreman’s Estate, , (title to surviving spouse’s interest in community real property is immediately vested); In re Monaghan’s Estate, , (survivor of marital community takes one-half of community property in his own right as owner and not as heir).
  • Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1986
    See In Re Monaghan’s Estate, , 5 Am.Jur.2d Appeal and Error § 754 (1962).
  • Cagle v. Carlson 705 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
    In the case of In Re Monaghan’s Estate, , our supreme court addressed the effect a prior appellate decision has on subsequent determinations in the same case.
  • Pridgeon v. Superior Court 655 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Clifton 656 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
  • State v. Reynolds 597 P.2d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • Stearns-Roger Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 571 P.2d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
    The phrase “law of the case” was extensively discussed in the case of In Re Monaghan’s Estate, , where the court states that it is well settled that a judgment of an appellate court in a case becomes the law in that particular case and is not subject to review thereafter on a second appeal.
  • Linsenmeyer v. Hancock 533 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    .” , 291 P. 1003 quoted in In Re Monaghan’s Estate
  • State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 515 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1973
  • Feffer v. Newman 497 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
    In re Monaghan’s Estate, , In re Foreman’s Estate, , , In re Coffee’s Estate, 19 Cal.2d 248 , In re Haselbud’s Estate, 26 Cal.App.2d 375 , In re Condos’ Estate, 70 Nev.
  • Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State 441 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    Graham County Electric Co-op., , In re Monaghan’s Estate, , , 291 P. 1003 (1930).
  • In Re Foreman's Estate 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
    for the proposition that where there are community property debts at the time of one spouse's death, the entire estate must be probated.
  • First National Bank v. Thomason 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
    In re Monaghan’s Estate, , ; In re Monaghan’s Estate, , ; In re Monaghan’s Estate, , , for the proposition that where there are community property debts at the time of one spouse’s death, the entire estate must be probated.
  • First National Bank v. Thomason 398 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
    Nowland v. Vinyard, supra; In re Monaghan’s Estate (1946) , ; In re Monaghan’s Estate (1950) , ; In re Monaghan’s Estate (1951) , .
  • Harbel Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 345 P.2d 427 Ariz. 1959
    In re Monaghan’s Estate, , .
  • In Re Jacob's Estate 305 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1956
    sought to be settled and determined should have been addressed to another court having jurisdiction to determine controversies involving title to real property.” The modern trend indicated in the cases cited by appellant harmonizes with the Faulkner and Wilson cases; other Arizona cases of like tenor are the following: In re Anderson’s Estate, , 158 P. 457 ; In re Monaghan’s Estate, , ; , ; , , 29 A.L.R.2d 518 ; , 275 P. 2 .
  • Sibley v. Jeffreys 305 P.2d 427 Ariz. 1956
    In re Monaghan’s Estate, , , on rehearing , ; , ; Western Coal & , ; , 298 P. 631 ; , 291 P. 1003 ; , 146 P. 504 .