Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam, 876 P.2d 1121.

178 citing documents.

Vincent G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vincent G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
ional methods of bonding with his Child, he must act persistently to establish the relationship however possible and must vigorously assert his 4 VINCENT G. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court legal rights to the extent necessary.” Matter of Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, see also Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 251, ¶ 25 (“The burden to act as a parent rests with the parent, who should assert his legal rights at the first and every opportunity.”).
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gloria M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 , , 101, , 1136 (1994).
Amber D. v. Dcs, C.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amber D. v. Dcs, C.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions Ariz. 2017
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions Ariz. 2017
Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, –01 (1994).
Rebekah G. v. Katy C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. S- 114487, ); -99, ¶ 12 (App. 2016) (“The existence and effect of a bonded relationship between a biological parent and a child, although a factor to consider, is not dispositive in addressing best interests.”) (citing Bennigno R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Tony J. v. Dcs, A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tony J. v. Dcs, A.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-114487, ).
Charna F. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Charna F. v. Dcs, C.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-114487
Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-114487
Anthony E. v. Dcs, A.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anthony E. v. Dcs, A.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-114487
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-114487, (“The law recognizes that judges cannot craft perfect justice for all sides in these disputes.
Angel B., Osanna B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Angel B., Osanna B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. S-114487, (court properly admitted transcripts of testimony from a dependency hearing in a termination hearing; the court correctly applied the higher, clear and convincing standard of proof when making its termination findings).
Diego G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Diego G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S- 114487
Jesus S. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jesus S. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
If circumstances are such that conventional methods of bonding are unavailable, a father “must act persistently to establish the relationship however possible and must vigorously assert his legal rights to the extent necessary.” In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487, Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 250, ¶ 22.
Erbey B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S-114487, (citing In re Raquel Marie X, 559 N.E.2d 418, 428 (N.Y.
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S-114487
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Our supreme court surmised in In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487, , 90 n. 2, , 1125 n. 2 (1994), that the legislature did so in response to the situation that arose in that case and cases like it, in which the putative father’s rights were severed on the ground of abandonment in order to facilitate the adoption of the child after the mother, but not the putative father
Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L. 365 P.3d 353 Ariz. 2016
Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L. 365 P.3d 353 Ariz. 2016
Severance Action No. S-114487, ).
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, (“The law favors rapid placement so that the child can bond with those who will be the legal parents and not with those from whom the child may be taken.
Brenda M. , Peter O. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Brenda M. , Peter O. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Juvenile Severance Action No. S–114487
Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Amanda W. v. Donovan F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, ).
Paige S. v. Dcs, G.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Paige S. v. Dcs, G.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juvenile Action No. S-114487
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juvenile Severance Action No. S- 114487, see also Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 251, ¶¶ 24-25, 995 P.2d at 687 (“The burden to act as a parent rests with the parent, who should assert [her] legal rights at the first and every opportunity.”).
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 29 The superior court cited In re Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, , but the father in that ease did nothing to establish a relationship with the child until he was served with the mother’s petition for termination.
Kenneth B. v. Tina B. 243 P.3d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Kenneth B. v. Tina B. 243 P.3d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
at 250, ¶ 20, 995 P.2d at 686 (quoting In re Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487, , ).