Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Kleindienst, 644 P.2d 249.
- In Re Zawada 92 P.3d 862 Ariz. 2004
-
In Re Zawada
92 P.3d 862
Ariz. 2004
In re Kleindienst, 132 Ariz. 95, 102, (citing In re Stout, 122 Ariz. 503, ).
- In re Retter 885 P.2d 1080 Ariz. 1994
- In re Retter 885 P.2d 1080 Ariz. 1994
- In re Stevens 872 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1994
-
In re Stevens
872 P.2d 665
Ariz. 1994
While one goal of lawyer discipline is to protect the public and the profession, , another is to deter the respondent and other attorneys from engaging in similar unethical conduct
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
- In re Ziman 847 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1993
- In re Ziman 847 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1993
- Matter of Hoover 779 P.2d 1268 Ariz. 1989
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fresquez 783 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1989
-
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fresquez
783 P.2d 774
Ariz. 1989
the Commission recommended a one-year suspension in lieu of disbarment.
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Murray 767 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1988
-
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Murray
767 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1988
(Feldman, J., dissenting).
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Grimble 759 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1988
-
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Grimble
759 P.2d 594
Ariz. 1988
(attorney found guilty of two out of nine charges ordered to pay costs and expenses of the proceeding)____ Rule 37(g), supra, does not expressly state that costs and expenses must be allocated to separate counts.
- In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona Riley 691 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1984
-
In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona Riley
691 P.2d 695
Ariz. 1984
(attorney found guilty of two out of nine charges ordered to pay costs and expenses of the proceeding).
- Matter of Wetzel 691 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1984
- Matter of Wetzel 691 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1984
- Matter of Swartz 686 P.2d 1236 Ariz. 1984
-
Matter of Swartz
686 P.2d 1236
Ariz. 1984
For support, respondent cites , quoting the following passage: The best support Kleindienst can muster for his defense is that the jury that considered the criminal charges arising from the same alleged perjury acquitted him.
- Matter of Wines 660 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1983
-
Matter of Wines
660 P.2d 454
Ariz. 1983
He specifically cites , as an example.
- Matter of Mercer 652 P.2d 130 Ariz. 1982
- Matter of Mercer 652 P.2d 130 Ariz. 1982