Cited by

¶ 18 (2003); -65, ¶ 6 (2013).

We address the Ekweanis’ arguments as best we can discern them, but we consider waived both arguments not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority, –65, ¶ 6 (2013), and those raised for the first time on appeal, see Amparano v. ASARCO, Inc., ¶ 13 (App. 2004)

Prods., (citation omitted), we will consider the merits of Ball’s arguments as best we can discern them, –65, ¶ 6, -89 (2013).

4 We have done our best to discern Petitioner’s arguments, “but we consider waived those arguments not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority.” -65, ¶ 6 (2013); see also Ariz. R. Civ.

– 65, ¶ 6 (2013).3 A. Attorney's Fees to Dottye.4 ¶9 Gardner argues that Dottye negotiated in bad faith at the settlement conference and thus should "forgo the $8,000.00 bargained for in the agreement."

¶ 14, (“We presume that a judge is impartial, and ‘the party seeking recusal must 4 LONGARIELLO v. AURA et al. Decision of the Court CONCLUSION ¶11 We affirm the s

–65 ¶ 6, –89 (2013) (“[W]e consider waived those arguments not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority.”).