Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Couser, 596 P.2d 26.

24 citing documents.

Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health Services 395 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health Services 395 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
at 470-71 ¶ 27, 974 P.2d at 449-50 ; , (concluding that setting aside a judgment relieves the offender from punishment that the law imposes for the crime but does not remove the fact that the offender committed the crime, meaning that the fact that the conviction was set aside cannot be used as a defense in a disciplinary proc
Raye v. Jones 76 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Raye v. Jones 76 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Benitez v. Dunevant 7 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2000
Benitez v. Dunevant 7 P.3d 99 Ariz. 2000
449 , solicitation of prostitution, , perjury, , forgery, see id., fraud, , and misappropriation of funds
Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance 974 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance 974 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
¶ 16 The Arizona Supreme Court addressed the effect of an order issued pursuant to section 13-907 in
Matter of Arrick 882 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Arrick 882 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1994
See In re Kersey, 520 A.2d 321 (D.C.App.1987) (discussing in depth the disease of alcoholism and the probable effect of various sanctions when encouraging attorneys to seek rehabilitation is the goal); see also Hoover, , (mental impairment or condition counts in mitigation); , (same); ABA Standards 9.32(h) (physical or mental disability or impairment mitigating factor) and (j) (interim rehabilitation mitigating factor).
In Re Jett 882 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Beren 874 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
(Misappropriation of a client’s funds is an offense involving moral turpitude and warrants disbarment absent extenuating circumstances).
Matter of Rivkind 791 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1990
Matter of Rivkind 791 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1990
(expungement of conviction upon fulfilling terms of probation is not a defense to disciplinary proceedings).
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Murray 767 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1988
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Murray 767 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1988
Matter of Hoover 745 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1987
Matter of Hoover 745 P.2d 939 Ariz. 1987
Hoover’s argument is based on language in
Matter of Rubi 652 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1982
Matter of Rubi 652 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1982
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nulle 620 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1980
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nulle 620 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1980
Rather, the purpose of discipline is to protect the public, the profession and the administration of justice, , and to deter other lawyers from temptation to violate their ethics

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by