Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Kersting, 726 P.2d 587.

55 citing documents.

Matter of Brown 910 P.2d 631 Ariz. 1996
Matter of Brown 910 P.2d 631 Ariz. 1996
In Re Varbel 897 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
In Re Varbel 897 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
Although this court is the final arbiter of law and fact in disciplinary cases, , we normally defer to the findings of the committee, especially in matters of witness credibility
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
see also rule 54(c), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
In re Stevens 872 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1994
In re Stevens 872 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1994
While one goal of lawyer discipline is to protect the public and the profession, , another is to deter the respondent and other attorneys from engaging in similar unethical conduct
In Re Augenstein 871 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1994
In Re Augenstein 871 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1994
see also rule 54(c), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
In re Redeker 868 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Augenstein 870 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1994
In re Redeker 868 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1994
The Commission agrees with the Committee that disbarment is the only sanction that will fulfill the purpose of lawyer discipline, which is to deter others and protect the public, , and to give the public confidence in the integrity of the bar
Matter of Augenstein 870 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1994
In Re Elowitz 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
In re Member of the State Bar 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
In re Member of the State Bar 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
see also rule 54(c), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
In Re Elowitz 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
see also rule 54(c), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
In , the Court stated, “In imposing lawyer sanctions, we are guided by the principle that ‘the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.’ ” 159 Ariz. at 526 [ 768 P.2d at 1171 ] ( , ).
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
In re Ziman 847 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1993
In re Ziman 847 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Laws-Coats 838 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Laws-Coats 838 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In , the Court stated “In imposing lawyer sanctions, we are guided by the principle that ‘the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.’ ” 159 Ariz. at 526 , 768 P.2d at 1171 ( , ).
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
D. Sanction We look to the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (1986) (hereinafter ABA Standards) to aid our determination of the appropriate sanction and recognize that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.” , (citation omitted).
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
In determining the appropriate sanction, we must remember that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.” , ( , ).
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
In determining the appropriate sanction, we are guided by the principle that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
C. Sanctions In determining the appropriate sanction, we are guided by the principle that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
In Re Zang 803 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1990
In Re Zang 803 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1990
We note that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
In Re Ockrassa 799 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1990
In Re Lincoln 798 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1990
In Re Lincoln 798 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1990
Guiding our decision is the principle that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
In Re Ockrassa 799 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1990
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Morris 793 P.2d 544 Ariz. 1990
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Morris 793 P.2d 544 Ariz. 1990
Guiding our decision is the principle that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fresquez 783 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1989
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fresquez 783 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1989
Guiding our decision is the principle that “the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.”
Matter of Arrick 775 P.2d 1080 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Arrick 775 P.2d 1080 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Bowen 774 P.2d 1348 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Bowen 774 P.2d 1348 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Spear 774 P.2d 1335 Ariz. 1989
Matter of Spear 774 P.2d 1335 Ariz. 1989