Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Petrie, 742 P.2d 796.
- In Re Scholl 25 P.3d 710 Ariz. 2001
- In Re Scholl 25 P.3d 710 Ariz. 2001
- Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A. 2 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A. 2 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
-
Distinguished
In Re Shannon
876 P.2d 548
Ariz. 1994
For instance, Respondent cites , and , conflict of interest cases in which we imposed only a censure.
- In re Marce 867 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1993
- In re Marce 867 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1993
- Matter of Lenaburg 864 P.2d 1052 Ariz. 1993
- Matter of Lenaburg 864 P.2d 1052 Ariz. 1993
- In re Evans 857 P.2d 1258 Ariz. 1993
- In re Evans 857 P.2d 1258 Ariz. 1993
- Matter of Wolfram 847 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1993
- Matter of Wolfram 847 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1993
- In re Cassalia 843 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1992
- In re Cassalia 843 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1992
- In Re Ockrassa 799 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1990
- In Re Ockrassa 799 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1990
- Foulke v. Knuck 784 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
Foulke v. Knuck
784 P.2d 723
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
The existence of an attorney-client relationship “is proved by showing that the party sought and received advice and assistance from the attorney in matters pertinent to the legal profession.”
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Evans 782 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1989
-
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Evans
782 P.2d 315
Ariz. 1989
Because this court is the ultimate trier of fact and law in disciplinary proceedings, , because there is no factual dispute about the conduct in question, and because no prejudice to respondent has been shown from any of the alleged irregularities, we do not reach those claims.
- Matter of Arrick 775 P.2d 1080 Ariz. 1989
-
Matter of Arrick
775 P.2d 1080
Ariz. 1989
See Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 526-28 , 768 P.2d at 1171-73
- Franko v. Mitchell 762 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Franko v. Mitchell 762 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988