Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Pappas, 768 P.2d 1161.

136 citing documents.

In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Mybeck 861 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Mybeck 861 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Duckworth 859 P.2d 1332 Ariz. 1993
In , the Court stated, “In imposing lawyer sanctions, we are guided by the principle that ‘the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.’ ” 159 Ariz. at 526 [ 768 P.2d at 1171 ] ( , ).
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fioramonti 859 P.2d 1315 Ariz. 1993
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fioramonti 859 P.2d 1315 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Brooks 854 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Brooks 854 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1993
In re Charles 847 P.2d 592 Ariz. 1993
In re Charles 847 P.2d 592 Ariz. 1993
In re Pappas, 159 Ariz. *94 516
Matter of Wade 846 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Wade 846 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1993
In re Offenhartz 843 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1992
In re Offenhartz 843 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1992
In re La Paglia 843 P.2d 1271 Ariz. 1992
In re La Paglia 843 P.2d 1271 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Laws-Coats 838 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Laws-Coats 838 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In , the Court stated “In imposing lawyer sanctions, we are guided by the principle that ‘the purpose of bar discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to deter others and protect the public.’ ” 159 Ariz. at 526 , 768 P.2d at 1171 ( , ).
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Clemmens 838 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Clemmens 838 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rosenzweig 838 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rosenzweig 838 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1992
In re Sadacca 836 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1992
In re Sadacca 836 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1992
In re Garnice 833 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1992
In re Garnice 833 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1992
In re Talmadge 832 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1992
In re Talmadge 832 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
Further, in prescribing the appropriate sanction, we must be “mindful of our goals to prescribe discipline consistent and proportional to that previously imposed in similar situations.” Arrick, 161 Ariz. at 22 , 775 P.2d at 1086 ( , ).
In re Tatham 829 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1992
In re Tatham 829 P.2d 1215 Ariz. 1992
Matter of Breen 830 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
Matter of Breen 830 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
C. Sanctions Recommendations of the Committee are entitled to serious consideration, , *411 (1988) (citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 108 , 708 P.2d at 1299 ), and we give them “great weight,” Lincoln, 165 Ariz. at 235 , 798 P.2d at 373 (citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 115 , 708 P.2d at 1306 ).
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Miranda 823 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Miranda 823 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rantz 817 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1991
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rantz 817 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Espino 811 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Espino 811 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1991
In re Jenkins 811 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1991
In re Jenkins 811 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1991