Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fresquez, 783 P.2d 774.

38 citing documents.

In Re Peasley 90 P.3d 764 Ariz. 2004
In Re Peasley 90 P.3d 764 Ariz. 2004
In re Fresquez, 162 Ariz. 328, 329-31, 335, -77, 781 (1989).
In Re Varbel 897 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
Distinguished In Re Varbel 897 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1995
We distinguish , and , where the evidence was uneontroverted that the attorneys had lied to the committee and commission.
In re Olsen 881 P.2d 337 Ariz. 1994
In re Olsen 881 P.2d 337 Ariz. 1994
In re Rubenstein 875 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1994
In re Rubenstein 875 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1994
As the *555 Court has stated, the duty to avoid this type of conduct “is perhaps the most fundamental ethical duty of a lawyer and is correspondingly supremely important.”
In re Riggs 869 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1994
In re Riggs 869 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1994
In re Redeker 868 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1994
In re Redeker 868 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1994
In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Schwartz 862 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1993
In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Schwartz 862 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1993
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fioramonti 859 P.2d 1315 Ariz. 1993
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Fioramonti 859 P.2d 1315 Ariz. 1993
This rule does not, however, “absolutely preclude[] State Bar counsel or a respondent from offering to the Commission evidence not presented to the committee where it properly falls into the category of newly discovered evidence.”
Matter of Riddle 857 P.2d 1233 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Riddle 857 P.2d 1233 Ariz. 1993
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rosenzweig 838 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rosenzweig 838 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1992
In a case involving similar conduct, , the respondent prepared a false document for signature by his client, made false statements during the disciplinary process, made false statements to his clients about filing their complaint and about trial dates, and made a payment to his client’s sister as an inducement to procure his client’s
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Gabriel 837 P.2d 149 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Gabriel 837 P.2d 149 Ariz. 1992
Ct., which provides that “Evidence not presented to the committee shall not be presented to the commission.” The Commission also considered , another case in which the respondent attempted to supplement the record at the Commission level.
Matter of Breen 830 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
Matter of Breen 830 P.2d 462 Ariz. 1992
(citing The American Bar Association’s Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (1986))
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rantz 817 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Gaynes 816 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Gaynes 816 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1991
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Rantz 817 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Wade 814 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Wade 814 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
Matter of Henry 811 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1991
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Castro 793 P.2d 1095 Ariz. 1990
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Castro 793 P.2d 1095 Ariz. 1990
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Tarletz 789 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1990
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Tarletz 789 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1990
MATTER OF MacASKILL 788 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1990
MATTER OF MacASKILL 788 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1990