Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Lincoln, 798 P.2d 371.

35 citing documents.

In Re a Member of the State Bar 951 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1998
Matter of Owens 893 P.2d 1284 Ariz. 1995
Matter of Owens 893 P.2d 1284 Ariz. 1995
Matter of Arrick 882 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Arrick 882 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1994
(disciplinary violations must be found by clear and convincing evidence).
Matter of Higgins 884 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Higgins 884 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1994
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
-36 , *57 373-74 (1990), citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 115 , 708 P.2d at 1306 .
In Re Augenstein 871 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1994
In Re Augenstein 871 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1994
-36 , -74 (1990), citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 115 , 708 P.2d at 1306 .
In Re Elowitz 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
In re Member of the State Bar 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
In re Member of the State Bar 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
-36 , -74 (1990), citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 115 , 708 P.2d at 1306 .
In Re Elowitz 866 P.2d 1326 Ariz. 1994
-36 , -74 (1990), citing Neville, 147 Ariz. at 115 , 708 P.2d at 1306 .
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Wolfram 847 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Wolfram 847 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1993
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Loftus 832 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Loftus 832 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1992
DISCUSSION In disciplinary proceedings, this court acts as an independent “trier of both fact and law.” , ( , ).
In Re Coffey 832 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1992
In Re Coffey 832 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Engan 825 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1992
DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review In disciplinary proceedings, this court acts as an independent “trier of both fact and law.” , ( , ).
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Miranda 823 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1992
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Miranda 823 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Nelson 824 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Lincoln 823 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1992
of the Committee and Commission,” , “we must be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that [Respondent committed the alleged violations.” , (emphasis added), citing rule 54(c); Pappas, 159 Ariz. at 518 , 768 P.2d at 1163 .
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Grant 821 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1991
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Grant 821 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1991
DISCUSSION In disciplinary proceedings, we act as an independent “ ‘trier of both fact and law.’ ” , ( , ).