Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Levine, 847 P.2d 1093.
- In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
-
In Re Shannon
876 P.2d 548
Ariz. 1994
See Standard 3.0 Commentary *72 (recommended sanctions for breaches of duty owed to clients are tailored to lawyer’s mental state and injury or potential injury to client); , (Standards are useful tool in determining proper sanction).
- In Re Bowen III 872 P.2d 1235 Ariz. 1994
-
In Re Bowen III
872 P.2d 1235
Ariz. 1994
ABA Standard 9.4(a) (forced restitution should not be “considered as either aggravating or mitigating”); -174 , -1021 (1993) (finding court-ordered sanctions mitigating where respondent has previously paid many of them).
- In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Levine 863 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1993
-
In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Levine
863 P.2d 254
Ariz. 1993
Therefore, pursuant to Rule 71(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, IT IS ORDERED affirming the terms of probation as set forth in the Opinion filed February 18, 1993, , , with the exception that the terms of Respondent’s payment of restitution, fees, costs and expenses will be determined by a payment schedule agreed to between Respondent and the State Bar.