Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rush v. French, 1 Ariz. 99.

38 citing documents.

Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church 537 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church 537 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
958 (see, also, Rose’s U.S. Notes); , 25 P. 816 ; 3 C.J. 862-864.
State v. Moore 495 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1972
State v. Moore 495 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1972
As Chief Justice Dunne of the Arizona Territory Supreme Court stated almost one hundred years ago: “Such things may do in love or war, when all things are said to be fair; but life is too short to transact business on such a system in courts of justice.” , 25 P. 816 , 822 (1874).
State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
In an early Arizona case this Court stated: “An objection that the testimony is irrelevant, without specifying wherein or how or why it is irrelevant, will not be considered in the supreme court as raising any issue, if the testimony could, under any possible circumstances, have been relevant.” , 25 P. 816 .
Rundle v. Republic Cement Corporation 341 P.2d 226 Ariz. 1959
State v. Hoffman 279 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1955
State v. Hoffman 279 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1955
Rush v. French, 1874, , 25 P. 816 .
J. & B. MOTORS, INC. v. Margolis 257 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1953
J. & B. MOTORS, INC. v. Margolis 257 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1953
City Transfer Co. v. Johnson 233 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1951
City Transfer Co. v. Johnson 233 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1951
958 (See, also, Rose's U.S. Notes); , 25 P. 816 ; 3 C.J. 862-864."
Podol v. Jacobs 173 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1946
Podol v. Jacobs 173 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1946
Upon cross-examination the witness may be interrogated “upon all matters pertinent to the case of the party calling him, except exclusively new matter and nothing shall be deemed new matter except it be such as could not be-given under a general denial.” , 25 P. 816 , 828.
Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
Douglass v. State 33 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1934
Cooper v. Francis 285 P. 271 Ariz. 1930
Cooper v. Francis 285 P. 271 Ariz. 1930
Bradley v. State 279 P. 256 Ariz. 1929
Bradley v. State 279 P. 256 Ariz. 1929
Security Benefit Assn. v. Small 272 P. 647 Ariz. 1928
Security Benefit Assn. v. Small 272 P. 647 Ariz. 1928
Central Copper Co. v. Klefisch 270 P. 629 Ariz. 1928
Central Copper Co. v. Klefisch 270 P. 629 Ariz. 1928
City of Prescott v. Sumid 247 P. 122 Ariz. 1926
City of Prescott v. Sumid 247 P. 122 Ariz. 1926
355 (see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes); , 25 Pac.
Smart v. Staunton 239 P. 514 Ariz. 1925
Smart v. Staunton 239 P. 514 Ariz. 1925
Rush v. French , , 25 P. 816 ; Johnson v. McLaughlin , , 4 P. 130 .
Gibson v. State 215 P. 729 Ariz. 1923
Gibson v. State 215 P. 729 Ariz. 1923
Hadley v. State 212 P. 458 Ariz. 1923
Hadley v. State 212 P. 458 Ariz. 1923
Machomich Mercantile Co. v. Hickey 140 P. 63 Ariz. 1914
Machomich Mercantile Co. v. Hickey 140 P. 63 Ariz. 1914
finger upon the point of objection.” , 25 Pac.
Graves v. Bonness 107 N.W. 163 Minn. 1906