Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Re Welisch, 163 P. 264.

25 citing documents.

Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(when making discretionary determination, trial court may rely on “‘personal wisdom and experience’”), 163 P. 264, 265-66 (1917); (in determining reasonable attorney fees, “trial judge can draw upon his knowledge of the case and upon his own experience”).
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Old West Bonding Co. 56 P.3d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
163 P. 264, 265 (1917) (“[W]hen the law gives to a court or judge a power to be exercised at discretion, it means a sound legal discretion.
Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger 871 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger 871 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Re Welisch, at 521-522 , 163 P. 264, at 265-266 (1917).
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Re Paul Welisch, , 163 P. 264 (1917)
State v. Jacobson 515 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1973
In Re Tarr 508 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1973
In Re Tarr 508 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1973
* * * ” Re Welisch, -520 , 163 P. 264, 265 (1917).
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
of right and justice, to decide an act in accordance with what is fair, equitable, and wholesome, as determined by the peculiar circumstances of the case, and as discerned by his personal wisdom and experience, guided by the spirit, principles, and analogies of the law, to be exercised in accordance with a wise, as distinguished from a mere arbitrary, use of power, and under the law.” Re Welisch, at 521-522 , 163 P. 264, at 265-266 (1917).
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Re Welisch, , 163 P. 264 (1917).
State v. Douglas 349 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1960
State v. Douglas 349 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1960
163 P. 264 ; , , 39 A.L.R.2d 979 ; , ; , .
State v. Pett 92 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1958
Bowman v. Hall 316 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1957
Bowman v. Hall 316 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1957
299, 303 , , 858: “ * * * the term ‘abuse of discretion’ does not mean any reflection upon the presiding judge and does not carry with it an implication of conduct deserving censure, but is strictly a legal term indicating that the appellate court is of the opinion that under the circumstances the trial judge committed error of law in the exercise of his discretion.” , 163 P. 264 , 265 — which was an application for bail pending appeal — gives an excellent dissertation on the meaning of “discret
Re Naff 46 P.2d 1116 Ariz. 1935
Re Naff 45 Ariz. 547 Ariz. 1935
Re Naff 45 Ariz. 547 Ariz. 1935
We have examined the petition and the arguments urged in support thereof, and are of the opinion that the law which governs matters of this kind is fully set forth in the case of Re Paul Welisch, , 163 Pac.
Re Naff 46 P.2d 1116 Ariz. 1935
We have examined the petition and the arguments urged in support thereof, and are of the opinion that the law which governs matters of this kind is fully set forth in the case of Re Paul Welisch , , 163 P. 264 .
Re Wood 163 P. 268 Ariz. 1917