In the Matter of Roger A. McKee
In the Matter of Roger A. McKee, No. cl-867590 (Ariz. July 15, 2002).
Opinion text
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
En Banc
In the Matter of a ) Arizona Supreme Court
Suspended and Inactive ) No. SB-02-0046-D
Member of the )
State Bar of Arizona ) Disciplinary Commission
) No. 00-1831
ROGER A. McKEE, )
Attorney No. 2715 )
) MEMORANDUM DECISION
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________)
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW
VACATED IN PART; APPROVED IN PART
_________________________________________________________________
State Bar of Arizona Phoenix
By Maret Vessella
Senior Bar Counsel
and Ralph Adams
Staff Bar Counsel
Attorneys for State Bar of Arizona
Fennemore Craig Phoenix
By Timothy J. Burke
Attorneys for Roger A. McKee
_________________________________________________________________
M c G R E G O R, Vice Chief Justice
¶1 This matter began as a disciplinary proceeding against
Respondent Roger A. McKee. During the course of the disciplinary
hearing, the hearing officer transferred McKee to temporary
disability status and set a hearing to determine whether he should
be transferred to permanent disability inactive status. See Ariz.
R. Sup. Ct. 59(b). On June 24, 2001, the hearing officer issued an
amended report, effecting the transfer and assessing the costs and
expenses of the disability proceeding against Respondent, pursuant
to Rule 59(b).
¶2 The State Bar did not file its statement of costs until
November 10, 2001, at which time Respondent objected on the basis
that the State Bar had not timely filed its statement. In its
decision of December 24, 2001, the Disciplinary Commission adopted
the hearing officer’s recommendation that McKee be placed on
permanent disability inactive status with probation and assessed
costs, pursuant to Rules 59(b), 52(a)6 and 8.
¶3 Respondent sought review to challenge the assessment of
costs against him. We agree that the State Bar failed to file a
timely statement of costs. The official note to Rule 59(e), which
permits the hearing officer to assess the costs of disability
proceedings, states that costs should be assessed “consistent with
rule 52(a)8.” Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 59(e), Note to 1991 Amendment.
Rule 52, in turn, directs the State Bar to file its statement of
costs “within seven (7) days after a hearing officer report is
filed.” Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 52(a)8. The Bar failed to file its
statement of costs within seven days and has provided no
explanation for that failure. Respondents in disciplinary and
disability proceedings are entitled to receive prompt notice of the
costs requested by the State Bar. We therefore vacate the
assessment of costs against McKee.
¶4 We also granted the State Bar’s cross-petition for review
2
to determine whether the Disciplinary Commission’s decision to
adopt terms of probation, to which McKee agreed, effectively
insulates McKee from any adverse consequence of disobeying the
terms of probation. We agree that, because McKee’s transfer to
permanent disability status stays all disciplinary matters, see
Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 59(b)2, the State Bar could not prosecute a
violation of the terms of probation. Moreover, imposing conditions
of probation conflicts with Rule 59(b)1.C, which provides that
orders of transfer to disability status “may include conditions of
conduct in the nature of probation . . . .” Ariz. R. Sup. Ct.
59(b)1.C (emphasis added). We therefore re-designate the terms of
probation imposed by the Disciplinary Commission and order that the
conditions set forth as terms of probation become effective as
conditions of conduct, pursuant to Rule 59(b). If Respondent fails
to comply with the Order of this court imposing those conditions of
conduct, he can be held in contempt of court in appropriate
proceedings.
¶5 We approve the remainder of the December 24, 2001
Disciplinary Commission Report.
______________________________________
Ruth V. McGregor, Vice Chief Justice
3
CONCURRING:
___________________________________
Charles E. Jones, Chief Justice
___________________________________
Stanley G. Feldman, Justice
___________________________________
Rebecca White Berch, Justice
4