| 1709 |
Ariz. |
1966-11-17 |
—
|
State v. Stelzriede
|
|
… sible under the doctrine announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , and the doctrine enunciated in Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 S.C …
|
| 1608 |
Ariz. |
1966-10-13 |
—
|
State v. Intogna
|
|
… Ct. 1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 , held that Escobedo v. State of Illinois, supra, and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , were not to be applied retroactively, and as the trial in the instant case was afte …
|
| 2 CA-CR 61 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1966-10-07 |
—
|
State v. Rogers
|
|
… trial.” .(Emphasis added) 84 S.Ct. at 1765 ' The Escobedo case was extended in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). In 'Miranda, the United States Supreme Court issued 'a mandate proscribing th …
|
| 1 CA-CR 81 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1966-08-12 |
—
|
State v. Chance
|
|
… atement in view of the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in State v. Miranda, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) and Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 , 86 S.Ct. 1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). While the require …
|
| 2 CA-HC 36 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1966-08-02 |
—
|
Loftis v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
|
|
… 6 (1966); State v. Fullen, 1 Ariz.App. 466, 470 , 404 P.2d 732 (1965); State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 (1965); State v. Simoneau, 98 Ariz. 2 , 401 P.2d 404 (1965). The question of voluntariness was not raised by counsel. Furthe …
|
| 1569 |
Ariz. |
1966-07-13 |
—
|
State v. Owen
|
|
… United States Supreme Court, in passing upon the retroactivity of Escobedo and Miranda, stated: “In the light of these additional considerations, we conclude that Escobedo and Miranda should apply only to cases commenced after those decisi …
|
| 1549 |
Ariz. |
1966-07-11 |
—
|
State v. Brock
|
|
… 8 , 84 S.Ct. 1758 , 12 L.Ed.2d 977 . We construed the Escobedo case in State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 , cert. granted 382 U.S. 925 , 86 S.Ct. 320 , 15 L.Ed.2d 338 . The United States Supreme Court reversed our decision on June …
|
| 2 CA-CR 60 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1966-07-07 |
—
|
State v. Miranda
|
| 1 CA-CIV 136 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1966-05-09 |
—
|
Knight v. Mewszel
|
|
… the existence of the jurisdictional fact that the residence is unknown. Lown v. Miranda, 34 Ariz. 32 , 267 P. 418 : ‘The general statute providing for service of summons by publication requires an affidavit, of the party seeking to obtain s …
|
| 1501 |
Ariz. |
1965-11-24 |
—
|
State v. Robison
|
|
… t the opinion of a lay witness is admissible where sanity is an issue. State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 11 , 401 P.2d 716 ; State v. Coey, 82 Ariz. 133 , 309 P.2d 260 . The fact that the one testifying is a lay witness goes to the weight to be gi …
|
| No. 1501 |
Ariz. |
1965-11-24 |
—
|
State v. Robison
|
|
… t the opinion of a lay witness is admissible where sanity is an issue. State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 11 , 401 P.2d 716 ; State v. Coey, 82 Ariz. 133 , 309 P.2d 260 . The fact that the one testifying is a lay witness goes to the weight to be gi …
|
| 1364 |
Ariz. |
1965-11-10 |
—
|
State v. Bird
|
|
… y right to assistance of counsel at the time of his interrogation. See State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 (1965). Judgment affirmed. STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and BERNSTEIN, J., concurring. …
|
| 1450 |
Ariz. |
1965-11-03 |
—
|
State v. Taylor
|
|
… to extra-judicial identification of the accused in the recent case of State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 11 , 401 P.2d 716 (1965). We said in that case: “ ‘Evidence of an extra-judicial identification is admissible, not only to corroborate an iden …
|
| 1558 |
Ariz. |
1965-10-28 |
—
|
State v. Goff
|
|
… State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 S.Ct. 1758 , 12 L.Ed.2d 977 , see State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 , and rejected Dorado quoting and citing many'of the cases adopting the opposing view. We did not conclude from Escobedo tha …
|
| 1 CA-CR 30 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1965-10-14 |
—
|
State v. Cobb
|
|
… lve the question of voluntariness outside of the presence of the jury. State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 at 728 (1965) and State v. Fullen, 1 Ariz. App. 466 , 404 P.2d 732 (1965). The defendants submit, on the basis of State v. P …
|
| 1 CA-CR 26 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1965-08-09 |
—
|
State v. Fullen
|
|
… on the voluntariness of a confession out of the presence of the jury. State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 (1965). All the evidence is to the effect that it was a voluntary statement. The following is the testimony of the officer o …
|
| No. 2 CA-CR 21 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1965-08-06 |
—
|
State v. Shook
|
|
… that the interrogation commenced. This court believes the decision of State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 , released on April 22, 1965, is conclusive of the defendant’s contention that his constitutional rights were violated in no …
|
| 2 CA-CR 3 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
1965-05-19 |
—
|
State v. Tannahill
|
|
… h methods. Justice McFarland, in a most recent opinion, in the case of State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 , decided April 22, 1965, in a most scholarly opinion, wrote on the admissibility of a statement made where the defendant di …
|
| 1325 |
Ariz. |
1965-05-14 |
—
|
State v. Sherrick
|
|
… le to the instant case for the same reasons set forth by this Court in State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18 , 401 P.2d 721 . (April 22, 1965). In Miranda we discussed fully the Escobedo case, supra, and said: “Under these circumstances, after revi …
|
| 1429 |
Ariz. |
1965-05-06 |
—
|
State v. Simoneau
|
|
… 30, p. 208, and decisions there cited. See also our recent decision in State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 11 , 401 P.2d 716 , citing People v. Gould, 54 Cal.2d 621 , 7 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 354 P.2d 685 , on this exact point. Finally, appellant urges tha …
|
| 1397 |
Ariz. |
1965-04-22 |
—
|
State v. Miranda
|
|
… STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice. ■ Ernest Arthur Miranda was charged with the crime of robbery. From the judg *14 ment of guilty and the sentence thereon he appeals. On the evening of November 27, 1962, the complaining witness, a young woma …
|
| 1394 |
Ariz. |
1965-04-22 |
—
|
State v. Miranda
|
|
… bbery charge, from which he is also appealing in the companion case of State v. Miranda, No. 1397, 98 Ariz. 11 , 401 P.2d 716 . The 'facts, as they relate to the defense as charged under Counts I and II in the instant case are as follows: O …
|
| 7250 |
Ariz. |
1964-11-12 |
—
|
Stearman v. Miranda
|
| 7483 |
Ariz. |
1964-04-16 |
—
|
Miranda v. Beaman
|
|
… LOCKWOOD, Vice Chief Justice. William B. Miranda, appellant, instituted proceedings in the Superior Court of Pima County for a review of a decision of the Employment Security Commission of Arizona. The decision dated May 12, 1960, denied Mi …
|
| 1262 |
Ariz. |
1964-04-01 |
—
|
State v. George
|
|
… ary of 1961. In chambers, the judge heard testimony from defense witness Gloria Miranda that she knew Valencia was a user of narcotics during January and February of 1961. The court refused to let this witness take the stand and be examined …
|
| 6826 |
Ariz. |
1963-05-29 |
—
|
Preston v. Denkins
|
|
… the existence of the jurisdictional fact that the residence is unknown. Lown v. Miranda, 34 Ariz. 32 , 267 P. 418 : “The general statute providing for service of summons by publication requires an affidavit, of the party seeking to obtain s …
|
| 6557 |
Ariz. |
1958-12-17 |
—
|
Application of Williams
|
|
… shows he could not be guilty of. Antone v. State, 49 Ariz. 168 , 65 P.2d 646 ; Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 P.2d 241 ; Singh v. State, supra; Campbell v. Territory, 14 Ariz. 109 , 125 P. 717 . The statute in question, under which th …
|
| 1076 |
Ariz. |
1955-12-13 |
—
|
State v. Boozer
|
|
… ven repulsive exhibits may be exhibited to the jury where relevant to the case. Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358, 367 , 26 P.2d 241 . Furthermore, the exhibits proved that the operation was upon a pregnant woman —part of the necessary proof u …
|
| 5615 |
Ariz. |
1953-02-16 |
—
|
Robinson v. Herring
|
|
… as a waiver of delivery of the lease on the part of the owner. And in Chovin v. Miranda, 18 Cal.App.2d 193 , 63 P.2d 845 , where the lease agreement was never physically delivered because of an understanding between lessor and lessee that i …
|
| No. 992. |
Ariz. |
1949-11-21 |
—
|
State v. Johnson
|
|
… he contrary, and it is incumbent upon defendant to contradict that presumption. Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 P.2d 241 ; Viliborghi v. State, 45 Ariz. 275 , 43 P.2d 210 .” See Moore v. State, 65 Ariz. 70 , 174 P.2d 282 ; Sullivan v. S …
|
| No. 970. |
Ariz. |
1947-07-11 |
—
|
State v. Singleton
|
|
… ng as the State’s evidence does not tend to show to the contrary. Sec. 44-1814; Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 P.2d 241 ; Viliborghi v. State, 45 Ariz. 275 , 43 P.2d 210 ; Harris v. State, 46 Ariz. 121 , 46 P.2d 1082 ; State v. Ponce, …
|
| No. 4801. |
Ariz. |
1946-03-11 |
—
|
Evans v. Hallas
|
|
… s by citing with approval from the opinion of the late Justice Ross, in Lown v. Miranda, 34 Ariz. 32 , 267 P. 418, 419 . “Precedent to the right to have constructive service under this statute, the existence of certain facts must be shown, …
|
| Civil No. 4582. |
Ariz. |
1943-11-08 |
—
|
Lane v. Greer
|
|
… d not hire you for this employment on the day you were hurt? A. No. “Q. And Mr. Miranda did not hire you on that day? A. Miranda? “Q. Yes. A. He told me he was left in charge, it was all right to go to work, he was left in charge. *4 “Q. Wh …
|
| Criminal No. 926. |
Ariz. |
1942-04-13 |
—
|
State of Arizona v. Ponce
|
|
… he contrary, and it is incumbent upon defendant to contradict that presumption. Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 Pac. (2d) 241 ; Viliborghi v. State, 45 Ariz. 275 , 43 Pac. (2d) 210 . Clearly, if the state’s evidence tends only to reduce …
|
| Criminal No. 889. |
Ariz. |
1940-06-06 |
—
|
Burgunder v. State of Arizona
|
|
… t’s motion to set aside the information. We had a similar question before us in Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 Pac. (2d) 241, 242 . In that case we said: “While the failure to read the complaint was therefore erroneous, yet in view of …
|
| Criminal No. 842. |
Ariz. |
1937-03-01 |
—
|
Antone v. State of Arizona
|
|
… grades of the offense, or grades the evidence shows he could not be guilty of. Miranda v. State, 42 Ariz. 358 , 26 Pac. (2d) 241, 243 ; Singh v. State, 35 Ariz. 432 , 280 Pac. 672 , 67 A. L. R. 129; Campbell v. Territory, 14 Ariz. 109 , 12 …
|
| Criminal No. 789. |
Ariz. |
1933-10-30 |
—
|
Miranda v. State
|
|
… LOCKWOOD, J. Severo Miranda, hereinafter called defendant, was informed against for the crime of murder. He was tried before a jury which returned a verlict of murder in the second degree and recommended extreme leniency. Prom the verdict a …
|
| Civil No. 2632. |
Ariz. |
1928-05-14 |
—
|
Lown v. Miranda
|
|
… ct, in proximity to a lot in the city of Nogales, Arizona, belonging to Jose M. Miranda, against which was assessed as its proportionate amount of the entire improvement the sum of $51.17. The improvement was made in pursuance of the terms …
|
| Civil No. 2560. |
Ariz. |
1927-05-24 |
—
|
Perazzo v. Ortega
|
|
… uch knowledge. In addition to what has already been stated, the witness Sanabia Miranda testified that a number of times prior to April 28th, 1924, this black dog came out as he went by and wanted to bite him; that he threw rocks at the dog …
|
| Civil No. 478 |
Ariz. |
1895-07-13 |
—
|
Miranda v. Goldman
|